As Susan Huse suggests, the "problem" is really not a problem at all. Any
raster file _created_ by GRASS4.0 or higher is automatically compressed using
run-length encoding. For imagery this usually does not result in very
significant disk space savings; hence the small difference in file size.
Run "r.compress -u raster_map_name" to uncompress if you want to compare file
sizes.
--
Malcolm D. Williamson - Research Assistant E-mail: malcolm@cast.uark.edu
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies Telephone: (501) 575-6159
Ozark Rm. 12 Fax: (501) 575-3846
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR 72701