It seems like the version are a little off on the sub-modules. Not sure if
the wrong data was committed to the wrong branch or not. Most of the issues
are with 2.6 branch - Is subversion still used for the nightly 2.6.5 build
on the sub modules?
geoserver
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-gast
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x has
version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x has
version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/master/pom.xml master has
2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-installer
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/2.6.x/build.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/2.8.x/build.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/master/build.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-doc-sources
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-release
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x has
version 2.6.0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x has
version 2.8.0-RC0
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.6.0
The reason I noticed this is because I was testing the 2.6.x nightly build
and I hit the same issue as Ticket #926 and I was looking to apply the same
patch to the GAST submodule however it doesn't seem like the correct
version....
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Application-versioning-seems-a-little-messed-up-on-submodules-tp4992707.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
So if I understand, we have 2.6.x with the wrong submodules, correct? I will take a look and see if I can figure out what to do.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:01 PM, ianwallen <ianwallen@anonymised.com> wrote:
It seems like the version are a little off on the sub-modules. Not sure if
the wrong data was committed to the wrong branch or not. Most of the issues
are with 2.6 branch - Is subversion still used for the nightly 2.6.5 build
on the sub modules?
geoserver
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-gast
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x has
version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x has
version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/master/pom.xml master has
2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-installer
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/2.6.x/build.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/2.8.x/build.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/master/build.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-doc-sources
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-release
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x has
version 2.6.0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x has
version 2.8.0-RC0
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.6.0
The reason I noticed this is because I was testing the 2.6.x nightly build
and I hit the same issue as Ticket #926 and I was looking to apply the same
patch to the GAST submodule however it doesn’t seem like the correct
version…
–
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Application-versioning-seems-a-little-messed-up-on-submodules-tp4992707.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Hi Ian,
I think I updated them correctly, although maybe you can verify for me. Also I checked that the spatial filter fixes were correctly merged and as far as I can tell they are.
Jesse
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Jesse Eichar <jesse.eichar@anonymised.com> wrote:
So if I understand, we have 2.6.x with the wrong submodules, correct? I will take a look and see if I can figure out what to do.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:01 PM, ianwallen <ianwallen@anonymised.com> wrote:
It seems like the version are a little off on the sub-modules. Not sure if
the wrong data was committed to the wrong branch or not. Most of the issues
are with 2.6 branch - Is subversion still used for the nightly 2.6.5 build
on the sub modules?
geoserver
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-gast
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x has
version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x has
version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-gast/blob/master/pom.xml master has
2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-installer
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/2.6.x/build.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/2.8.x/build.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-installer/blob/master/build.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-doc-sources
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x
has version 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x
has version 2.8.0-RC0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-doc-sources/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
core-release
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml 2.6.x has
version 2.6.0
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/2.8.x/pom.xml 2.8.x has
version 2.8.0-RC0
?? https://github.com/geonetwork/core-release/blob/master/pom.xml master
has 2.6.0
The reason I noticed this is because I was testing the 2.6.x nightly build
and I hit the same issue as Ticket #926 and I was looking to apply the same
patch to the GAST submodule however it doesn’t seem like the correct
version…
–
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Application-versioning-seems-a-little-messed-up-on-submodules-tp4992707.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
I see that you did a commit to try to fix the issue but I don't think it
changed anything regarding this issue. Maybe there is a misunderstanding
with the issue.
I was just looking at http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/HowToCompile
HowToCompile and it specifies to use subversion to build the 2.6 release.
I'm trying to build 2.6.5 via git as I seen a 2.6 branch in the git
repository. So if 2.6 should be built from subversion then why have a 2.6
branch in git?
I'm assuming that since the switch from SVN to GIT, the 2.6 branch in git
would not have change much, so I would expect that most of the files are
similar to the old svn files. (At least in the areas where it references the
version)
However if I compare the following 2 files.
https://geonetwork.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/geonetwork/branches/2.6.x/geoserver/pom.xml
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml
I see that the svn version has the following
<parent>
<groupId>org.geonetwork-opensource</groupId>
<artifactId>geonetwork</artifactId>
<version>2.6.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
while the git version has the following
<parent>
<groupId>org.geonetwork-opensource</groupId>
<artifactId>geonetwork</artifactId>
<version>2.9.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
As the git version specifies 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT - I'm assuming that the 2.6
branch has issues?
Are we supposed to be able to build a 2.6 version of the repository using
the source from Git?
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Application-versioning-seems-a-little-messed-up-on-submodules-tp4992707p4992982.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are supposed to build 2.6 from git. I think I must have made a mistake when I made the 2.6.x submodules because I was focussed on 2.8 and trunk. It looks like all of them. I am guessing that I must have skipped some steps with 2.6 and probably just made a tag off of master or something.
At least for docs and release I think I need to grab the correct version. For the others we can probably just update the poms
Jesse
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:49 PM, ianwallen <ianwallen@anonymised.com> wrote:
I see that you did a commit to try to fix the issue but I don’t think it
changed anything regarding this issue. Maybe there is a misunderstanding
with the issue.
I was just looking at http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/HowToCompile
HowToCompile and it specifies to use subversion to build the 2.6 release.
I’m trying to build 2.6.5 via git as I seen a 2.6 branch in the git
repository. So if 2.6 should be built from subversion then why have a 2.6
branch in git?
I’m assuming that since the switch from SVN to GIT, the 2.6 branch in git
would not have change much, so I would expect that most of the files are
similar to the old svn files. (At least in the areas where it references the
version)
However if I compare the following 2 files.
https://geonetwork.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/geonetwork/branches/2.6.x/geoserver/pom.xml
https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geoserver/blob/2.6.x/pom.xml
I see that the svn version has the following
org.geonetwork-opensource
geonetwork
2.6.5-SNAPSHOT
while the git version has the following
org.geonetwork-opensource
geonetwork
2.9.0-SNAPSHOT
As the git version specifies 2.9.0-SNAPSHOT - I’m assuming that the 2.6
branch has issues?
Are we supposed to be able to build a 2.6 version of the repository using
the source from Git?
–
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Application-versioning-seems-a-little-messed-up-on-submodules-tp4992707p4992982.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork