Hi all,
As discussed this morning in IRC meeting [1], I tried to format the agenda for Bolsena, in order to assign priority to each topics listed in the “Topics for GeoNetwork discussion in Bolsena 2010” wiki page [2].
The idea is to give you a chance to read up and give your priority to the differents topics.
So feel free to put your name with in brackets how important it is for you (in the last column of the table, called “People interested in”).
We will discuss it next week during our weekly IRC meeting.
Thanks for your contributions.
Another point is about the release 2.5.1 which was planned for soon if I well remember…
The idea is to wait because we need more tickets fixed before a consistent v2.5.1.
We also have to reassigned the v2.5.0 tickets to target 2.5.1 and to assigned them to volonteers! 
Cheers,
Mathieu
[1] http://logs.qgis.org/geonetwork/%23geonetwork.2010-05-18.log
[2] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/Bolsena2010
great, Mathieu !
Let’s constrain the “how important it is to you” to the numbers 1 through 5, with 1 being most important.
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Mathieu Coudert <mathieu.coudert@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed this morning in IRC meeting [1], I tried to format the agenda for Bolsena, in order to assign priority to each topics listed in the “Topics for GeoNetwork discussion in Bolsena 2010” wiki page [2].
The idea is to give you a chance to read up and give your priority to the differents topics.
So feel free to put your name with in brackets how important it is for you (in the last column of the table, called “People interested in”).
We will discuss it next week during our weekly IRC meeting.
Thanks for your contributions.
Another point is about the release 2.5.1 which was planned for soon if I well remember…
The idea is to wait because we need more tickets fixed before a consistent v2.5.1.
We also have to reassigned the v2.5.0 tickets to target 2.5.1 and to assigned them to volonteers!
Cheers,
Mathieu
[1] http://logs.qgis.org/geonetwork/%23geonetwork.2010-05-18.log
[2] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/Bolsena2010
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Hi Heikki,
Indeed I forgot to specify that we thought use the same terms as in trac : trivial, minor, major, critical, blocker
But as you use range of 5 numbers, the equivalence is easy to do!
So we could consider that 1 is blocker and 5 is trivial.
Cheers,
Mathieu
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:35 AM, heikki <tropicano@anonymised.com1…> wrote:
great, Mathieu !
Let’s constrain the “how important it is to you” to the numbers 1 through 5, with 1 being most important.
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Mathieu Coudert <mathieu.coudert@anonymised.com…31…> wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed this morning in IRC meeting [1], I tried to format the agenda for Bolsena, in order to assign priority to each topics listed in the “Topics for GeoNetwork discussion in Bolsena 2010” wiki page [2].
The idea is to give you a chance to read up and give your priority to the differents topics.
So feel free to put your name with in brackets how important it is for you (in the last column of the table, called “People interested in”).
We will discuss it next week during our weekly IRC meeting.
Thanks for your contributions.
Another point is about the release 2.5.1 which was planned for soon if I well remember…
The idea is to wait because we need more tickets fixed before a consistent v2.5.1.
We also have to reassigned the v2.5.0 tickets to target 2.5.1 and to assigned them to volonteers!
Cheers,
Mathieu
[1] http://logs.qgis.org/geonetwork/%23geonetwork.2010-05-18.log
[2] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/Bolsena2010
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork