Dear Developers,
We are from George Mason University; and currently we are using GeoNetwork for our GEOSS Clearinghouse program. We found a boundingbox issue when we use OGC templete for CSW getRecords request as below:
Geonetwork defines boudingbox in /trunk/web/src/main/webapp/xml/schemas/iso19139/present/csw/ogc-full.xsl and /trunk/web/src/main/webapp/xml/schemas/iso19139/present/csw/ogc-brief.xsl
<ows:LowerCorner>
<xsl:value-of select="concat(gmd:eastBoundLongitude/gco:Decimal, ' ', gmd:southBoundLatitude/gco:Decimal)"/>
</ows:LowerCorner>
<ows:UpperCorner>
<xsl:value-of select="concat(gmd:westBoundLongitude/gco:Decimal, ' ', gmd:northBoundLatitude/gco:Decimal)"/>
</ows:UpperCorner>
But we checked the OGC:GML Encoding Standard(http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20509), we think that the LowerCorner should be(west,south) and the UpperCorner should be(East, North)
"The first direct position is the "lower corner" (a coordinate position consisting of all the minimal ordinates for each dimension for all points within the envelope), the second one the "upper corner" (a coordinate position consisting of all the maximal ordinates for each dimension for all points within the envelope)." Page60.
Could you please look into this? Thanks and best regards,
Kai
Joint Center for Intelligent Spatial Computing
703-395-2337
Forwarding comments from New Zealand Geospatial Office in respond to these
questions:
Hi Byron (and others)
Thanks for your question, I've had a look into the question (with help from
Stephen - thanks) and have the following comments:
• ISO 19115 defines EX_GeographicBoundingBox as
o + westBoundLongitude : Angle
o + eastBoundLongitude : Angle
o + southBoundLatitude : Angle
o + northBoundLatitude : Angle
i.e. The ISO standard defines a bounding box be described as two sets of
lines of longitude and lines of latitude.
• In contrast, as quoted below the OGC defines a bounding box differently.
The GML Standard (OGC 07-036) as quoted below defines the Envelop as a set
of points the minimal ordinates followed by the maximum ordinates. I.e. the
lower x-, y-values followed by the upper x-, y-values - corresponding to
south, west then east, north - as suggested by Kai 
• In contrast (yet again), GeoNetwork as quoted below seems to define a
bounding box differently.
So overall GeoNetwork seems to define the bounding box differently to ISO
and OGC. Note however, all these definitions provide alternative and equally
appropriate ways of defining a bounding box. And I gather that in practice
it may well not matter what order the ordinates are provided in... parsing
should be able to make sense of the coordinates, regardless of order
provided...
In addition, I note that the OGC standard (07-036) seems a bit misleading.
In particular, the standard refers p.60 to "minimal ordinates" and "maximal
ordinates"... without defining ordinate. I suggest that it may make
(slightly) more sense 07-036 was revised such that "coordinates" was used in
place of "ordinates". Coordinates being a pair of ordinate (y-axis) and
abscissa (x-axis) values.
I'll have to hand over to Richard to comment regarding the what if anything
needs to be done re the "standards issue(s)" this raises and how we might
contribute to the discussion...
Please feel free to post this answer on the GeoNetwork user forum.
Cheers,
John
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Boundingbox-issue-for-discussion-tp6742832p6748000.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thursday, 1 September 2011 6:16 AM ByronCinNZ wrote:
<snip>
In addition, I note that the OGC standard (07-036) seems a
bit misleading.
In particular, the standard refers p.60 to "minimal
ordinates" and "maximal
ordinates"... without defining ordinate. I suggest that it may make
(slightly) more sense 07-036 was revised such that
"coordinates" was used in
place of "ordinates". Coordinates being a pair of ordinate
(y-axis) and
abscissa (x-axis) values.
"ordinate" is a cartographic or surveying term that means one element in a coordinate system. Most people are aware that "coordinate" means a pair of values defining a location in a two dimensional spatial system but, as an ex surveyor, I understand "ordinate" to be one element of that pair or a distance along one axis. Hence a latitude or a longitude would be an "ordinate". A latitude and a longitude stated together would be a "coordinate".
Hence OGC's use of "minimal ordinates" and "maximal ordinates" makes sense for a bounding box. The "minimal ordinates" would be most Southerly latitude and the most Westerly longitude. The "maximal ordinates" would be the most Northerly latitude and the most Easterly longitude. Hence the bounding box would be the North, South, East and West ordinates.
I hope this helps.
John
<snip>
Cheers,
John
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Boundingbox-issue-for-d
iscussion-tp6742832p6748000.html
Sent from the GeoNetwork developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork