The BlueNetMEST build failed the first time due to a missing file that’s actually generated at runtime. Not sure why, but leave it up to Simon to look into it.
Hope this is helpful. An email will be send to the commit mailinglist and to the committer in case a build breaks due to a new commit. The system does an hourly check for new commits.
Based on the failure message it sent out after my commit I think the BlueNetMEST build is running installer/build.xml rather than build.xml. Alternatively it could be running build.xml from the root folder with the all or installer targets, but that should be doing the war build also. Without seeing the full output it is difficult to tell which is the case.
The BlueNetMEST build failed the first time due to a missing file that’s actually generated at runtime. Not sure why, but leave it up to Simon to look into it.
Hope this is helpful. An email will be send to the commit mailinglist and to the committer in case a build breaks due to a new commit. The system does an hourly check for new commits.
Yep - no need to build the installer with a separate invocation - just use all on the root build.xml. Seems to work fine from a local hudson here with any of the installer, all and war/default targets.
Cheers and thanks,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Dempsey, James (CSIRO IM&T, Yarralumla)
Sent: Wednesday, 15 October 2008 5:41 PM
To: Jeroen.Ticheler@anonymised.com; geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [ExternalEmail] Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Continuous Integration builds
Hi Jeroen,
Based on the failure message it sent out after my commit I think the BlueNetMEST build is running installer/build.xml rather than build.xml. Alternatively it could be running build.xml from the root folder with the all or installer targets, but that should be doing the war build also. Without seeing the full output it is difficult to tell which is the case.
Cheers,
James Dempsey
________________________________
From: Jeroen Ticheler [mailto:Jeroen.Ticheler@anonymised.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 October 2008 8:24 AM
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [GeoNetwork-devel] Continuous Integration builds
Hi all,
I set up Continuous integration for three GeoNetwork builds now:
- Trunk
- ebXML related developments under the 3.0.x branch
- BlueNetMEST branch
The BlueNetMEST build failed the first time due to a missing file that's actually generated at runtime. Not sure why, but leave it up to Simon to look into it.
Hope this is helpful. An email will be send to the commit mailinglist and to the committer in case a build breaks due to a new commit. The system does an hourly check for new commits.
OK, as you probably noticed, I changed the build to use the build.xml in root. Works nice and quick! Erik is also looking into the build process ad the use of Maven, so he'll be in touch with you to see how things can be aligned and optimized so we have again one common build script (in version 3.x!?)
Cheers,
Jeroen
On Oct 16, 2008, at 1:49 AM, <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com> <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com > wrote:
Yep - no need to build the installer with a separate invocation - just use all on the root build.xml. Seems to work fine from a local hudson here with any of the installer, all and war/default targets.
Cheers and thanks,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Dempsey, James (CSIRO IM&T, Yarralumla)
Sent: Wednesday, 15 October 2008 5:41 PM
To: Jeroen.Ticheler@anonymised.com; geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [ExternalEmail] Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Continuous Integration builds
Hi Jeroen,
Based on the failure message it sent out after my commit I think the BlueNetMEST build is running installer/build.xml rather than build.xml. Alternatively it could be running build.xml from the root folder with the all or installer targets, but that should be doing the war build also. Without seeing the full output it is difficult to tell which is the case.
Cheers,
James Dempsey
________________________________
From: Jeroen Ticheler [mailto:Jeroen.Ticheler@anonymised.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 October 2008 8:24 AM
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [GeoNetwork-devel] Continuous Integration builds
Hi all,
I set up Continuous integration for three GeoNetwork builds now:
- Trunk
- ebXML related developments under the 3.0.x branch
- BlueNetMEST branch
The BlueNetMEST build failed the first time due to a missing file that's actually generated at runtime. Not sure why, but leave it up to Simon to look into it.
Hope this is helpful. An email will be send to the commit mailinglist and to the committer in case a build breaks due to a new commit. The system does an hourly check for new commits.
Hi all,
I now disabled the option to create new accounts on Hudson CI. Myself, Heikki, Erik, Francois, Simon and James have accounts for now and I can manually add new ones, but it doesn't seem very useful to just allow anyone to create new accounts. On top of that, I don't seem to be able to delete users
Cheers,
Jeroen
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
