Hi List,
After having added a new index field to the lucene index is there a way to force a re-index the metadata?
Cheers,
Michael Gannon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gannon Michael
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2006 10:21
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [GeoNetwork-devel] ISO 19139,profiles and and othe questions about the interaction withGeoNetwork
Well I was able to get the search working but I had to make an additional change to the iso19115.xsl file, I added a test to determine if there was no text node and in that event test for @value.
<xsl:template match=“*”>
<xsl:param name=“name” select=“name(.)”/>
<xsl:param name=“store” select=“‘false’”/>
<xsl:param name=“index” select=“‘true’”/>
<xsl:param name=“token” select=“‘false’”/>
<xsl:if test="string(.) = ‘’ ">
</xsl:if>
<xsl:if test="string(.) != ‘’ ">
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
I’ve said it before but XML is not my strong suit so please if there is someone that can make this a more appropriate patch please pipe up as I’d like to see this change made in a more reliable manner.
Cheers,
Michael Gannon.
-----Original Message-----
From: geonetwork-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:geonetwork-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Gannon Michael
Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2006 4:52
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] ISO 19139,profiles and and othe questions about the interaction withGeoNetwork
Hi list,
Following from your response to Johns question about adding search criteria for hierarchy level, I have added these two fragments into the lucene and iso19115 xsl’s.
Lucene.xsl:
<xsl:if test=“string(/request/hierarchy)!=‘’”>
</xsl:if>
iso19115.xsl:
<xsl:apply-templates select=“/Metadata/dqInfo/dqScope/scpLvl/ScopeCd/”>
<xsl:with-param name=“name” select=“‘hierarchy’”/>
<xsl:with-param name=“token” select=“‘true’”/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
The index field being generated from the indexing xsl is as follows:
It seems as though the value of the selected hierarchy level is stored in the metadata as an attribute of the /Metadata/dqInfo/dqScope/scpLvl/ScopeCd element.
My XML knowledge is not my strong suit, so shoot me down if I’m wrong, I think the problems are coming up because the value of hierarchy level is stored as an attribute value. Should the value be stored as an attribute value or as a text node of the element.
Cheers,
Michael Gannon.
PS. I’ve cut down the original email to prevent headaches 
-----Original Message-----
From: geonetwork-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:geonetwork-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Andrea Carboni
Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2006 1:06
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] ISO 19139,profiles and and othe questions about the interaction withGeoNetwork
Hi John,
I will try to answer to your questions.
……
-11-----------
yes it is. You have to change the indexing stylesheet (a short one) and to add
those fields to the web form (another simple stylesheet).
……
Cheers,
Andrea
Hi all,
As you may be aware my colleague Michael Gannon is investigating setting up
GeoNetwork as a prototype to manage our organisation’s ISO 19115 metadata.
We will probably use GeoNetwork as a prototype to enter, edit and store
metadata as well as get users to identify their requirements of a CSW.
As you know a while ago I mentioned about the ISO 19139 XSDs on this list and
thanks to Jeroen, Andrea and probably others, GeoNetwork now somehow handles
the ISO 19139 XML metadata format. I think that I also mentioned that the
ISO 19139 XML implementation doesn’t cater for all the ISO 19115 constraints
and code lists so ANZLIC - the Spatial Information Council (for Australia and
New Zealand) is cloning the ISO 19139 XSDs, adding Schematron to these cloned
XSDs and creating XML to represent the different ISO 19115 and ANZLIC code
lists. We are also adding XSDs and Schematron that allows for ISO 19119
metadata. That is, metadata for “services”. The XSDs were taken from the
eden web site mentioned in my previous emails but the Schematron, again
handles the constraints that the XSDs can’t implement.
Michael is using GeoNetwork 2.1.0 alpha-1 and has posted a couple of problems
that he has encountered to this list. I also have the following questions
which I hope you can answer to help us decide if we will use GeoNetwork for
our prototype. The question s are:
……
- Is it easy to configure GeoNetwork 2.1.0 alpha-1 advanced search
interface to search for other ISO 19115 elements such as, multiple
hierarchyLevelNames? For example, search for all metadata about “software”
or all metadata about “dataset” and “series”.
……
I thank you in advance for any answers to these questions that will help us
decide if we use GeoNetwork for out prototype CSW.
Thanks.
John
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork