Cool to see these things improve!
I have a small request to you :-). Please make sure that when you commit language string updates, you also add those strings to the other language files (Spanish, Chinese and Arabic) even if they are not translated. Just use the English ones as default. Failing to do this will result in a long process of alignment of the string files and also causes voids for those using the GUI in the respective languages for the missing strings...
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Jeroen
On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:29 AM, bluenetdevteam@anonymised.com wrote:
Fixes by Pierre Lagarde and Simon Pigot to add language support and simplified
messaging to the validation output
This line, and those below, will be ignored--
M web/geonetwork/xsl/metadata-validate.xsl
M web/geonetwork/xsl/res-error.xsl
M web/geonetwork/loc/en/xml/metadata-validate.xml
M web/geonetwork/loc/fr/xml/metadata-validate.xml
Cool to see these things improve!
I have a small request to you :-). Please make sure that when you commit language string updates, you also add those strings to the other language files (Spanish, Chinese and Arabic) even if they are not translated. Just use the English ones as default. Failing to do this will result in a long process of alignment of the string files and also causes voids for those using the GUI in the respective languages for the missing strings...
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Jeroen
Hi Jeroen,
Thanks. Will do - I'll commit the english version to the other languages later this morning when at work.
Hi all, you're right Jeroen we are always missing some strings in
language files. I tried to do a simple service to do some check on that
point.
Attached is an html page with i18n strings status for strings.xml.
* green = ok
* red = missing element
* yellow = element with same value as english
I added a service test.i18n which loop over all english strings and
check if exist in other files. There's some red on the current
strings.xml in the trunk
That's a proposal which could be extended to check all files and added
to the trunk for test.
Then we need to fix missing strings....
Ciao. Francois
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Jeroen
On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:29 AM, bluenetdevteam@anonymised.com
wrote:
Fixes by Pierre Lagarde and Simon Pigot to add language support and
simplified
messaging to the validation output
This line, and those below, will be ignored--
M web/geonetwork/xsl/metadata-validate.xsl
M web/geonetwork/xsl/res-error.xsl
M web/geonetwork/loc/en/xml/metadata-validate.xml
M web/geonetwork/loc/fr/xml/metadata-validate.xml
Hi Francois,
If that’s a proposal, I fully support it and stimulate you to add it!
So +1 from me, even though I don’t think we need an official vote for such non-disruptive feature. Would you add it as and Administrator service?
Ciao,
Jeroen
On Feb 19, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Francois-Xavier Prunayre wrote:
Hi all, you’re right Jeroen we are always missing some strings in
language files. I tried to do a simple service to do some check on that
point.
Attached is an html page with i18n strings status for strings.xml.
green = ok
red = missing element
yellow = element with same value as english
I added a service test.i18n which loop over all english strings and
check if exist in other files. There’s some red on t in the trunk
That’s a proposal which could be extended to check all files and added
to the trunk for test.
Hi Francois,
If that's a proposal, I fully support it and stimulate you to add it!
That's quick dev done in a one hour train trip this morning but we're
all spending times on that ...
So +1 from me, even though I don't think we need an official vote for
such non-disruptive feature. Would you add it as and Administrator service?
That's more a service for developers so it could be available for admin
users only and not linked anywhere from GeoNetwork user interface ?
Maybe it's better to have it for admin only because it's CPU consumming !
Will clean it and commit.
Francois
Ciao,
Jeroen
On Feb 19, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Francois-Xavier Prunayre wrote:
Hi, FYI I made an update on loc files for 22x branch (r1139) (config.xml
and strings.xml should be ok) and I will align the trunk later, once the
test services for i18n ready.
Ciao. Francois
Francois-Xavier Prunayre wrote:
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
Hi Francois,
If that's a proposal, I fully support it and stimulate you to add it!
That's quick dev done in a one hour train trip this morning but we're
all spending times on that ...
So +1 from me, even though I don't think we need an official vote for
such non-disruptive feature. Would you add it as and Administrator service?
That's more a service for developers so it could be available for admin
users only and not linked anywhere from GeoNetwork user interface ?
Maybe it's better to have it for admin only because it's CPU consumming !
Will clean it and commit.
Francois
Ciao,
Jeroen
On Feb 19, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Francois-Xavier Prunayre wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsore
