[GeoNetwork-devel] new UI - pull request

GeoNetwork GeoNetwork Developer
1

Hi,

I've got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
comments or reviews will be appreciated.

Thank you,
María.

[1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81

2

Hola Maria,

···

good to see this work on the UI proposed to GeoNetwork. Having a quicklook, I’ve seen some minor stuff to fix (eg. NGR specific, missing loc). I’ll try to post comments on the PR by friday.

It’s quite a major work and maybe could be proposed as a proposal [1] so more people could have an idea of the results ? It’s only a suggestion. It could be nice to make a list of differences - new or missing features - with other widget UIs. This could be useful if we want at some point make this UI the default and add the missing features if needed.

Cheers.

Francois

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

2013/3/25 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>

Hi,

I’ve got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
comments or reviews will be appreciated.

Thank you,
María.

[1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81

Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar

GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

3

This is great work! I’d like to see it made into a proposal too - it deserves that - as it uses html5 and its very good to direct users to a proposal on GeoNetwork opensource Developer website so that they can see an at least see an example of how they can use this in their own interfaces to GeoNetwork.

Cheers and thanks for this!
Simon

···

good to see this work on the UI proposed to GeoNetwork. Having a quicklook, I’ve seen some minor stuff to fix (eg. NGR specific, missing loc). I’ll try to post comments on the PR by friday.

It’s quite a major work and maybe could be proposed as a proposal [1] so more people could have an idea of the results ? It’s only a suggestion. It could be nice to make a list of differences - new or missing features - with other widget UIs. This could be useful if we want at some point make this UI the default and add the missing features if needed.

Cheers.

Francois

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

2013/3/25 María Arias de Reyna delawen@anonymised.com

Hi,

I’ve got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
comments or reviews will be appreciated.

Thank you,
María.

[1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81

Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar

GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

4

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM, sppigot <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com> wrote:

This is great work! I'd like to see it made into a proposal too - it
deserves that - as it uses html5 and its very good to direct users to a
proposal on trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork so that they can see an at least see
an example of how they can use this in their own interfaces to GeoNetwork.

Cheers and thanks for this!
Simon

----- Original Message -----
From: Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 19:05
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] new UI - pull request
To: María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>
Cc: "Devel geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

Hola Maria,

good to see this work on the UI proposed to GeoNetwork. Having a
quicklook, I've seen some minor stuff to fix (eg. NGR specific, missing
loc). I'll try to post comments on the PR by friday.

It's quite a major work and maybe could be proposed as a proposal [1] so
more people could have an idea of the results ? It's only a suggestion. It
could be nice to make a list of differences - new or missing features - with
other widget UIs. This could be useful if we want at some point make this UI
the default and add the missing features if needed.

Cheers.

Francois

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

2013/3/25 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>

> Hi,
>
> I've got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
> should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
> comments or reviews will be appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> María.
>
> [1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
> GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
> GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

Thanks for the comments. I'll write a proporsal to make it more clear
and remove some custom settings.

5

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:43 AM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM, sppigot <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com> wrote:

This is great work! I'd like to see it made into a proposal too - it
deserves that - as it uses html5 and its very good to direct users to a
proposal on trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork so that they can see an at least see
an example of how they can use this in their own interfaces to GeoNetwork.

Cheers and thanks for this!
Simon

----- Original Message -----
From: Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 19:05
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] new UI - pull request
To: María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>
Cc: "Devel geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

Hola Maria,

good to see this work on the UI proposed to GeoNetwork. Having a
quicklook, I've seen some minor stuff to fix (eg. NGR specific, missing
loc). I'll try to post comments on the PR by friday.

It's quite a major work and maybe could be proposed as a proposal [1] so
more people could have an idea of the results ? It's only a suggestion. It
could be nice to make a list of differences - new or missing features - with
other widget UIs. This could be useful if we want at some point make this UI
the default and add the missing features if needed.

Cheers.

Francois

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

2013/3/25 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>

> Hi,
>
> I've got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
> should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
> comments or reviews will be appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> María.
>
> [1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
> GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
> GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

Thanks for the comments. I'll write a proporsal to make it more clear
and remove some custom settings.

Hi,

I'm not sure where should I put the link to the proporsal[1]. Should
it be on the table of 2.9.x[2] or not yet? And... is the proporsal ok
or should I add more info?

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/Html5UI
[2]http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

6

Hi Maria

I think in 2.9.x section is fine to add.

About proposal content, would be good to add some screenshots, so people can check it. There’s a link to project website that originated this new UI, but the proposal has changes to remove custom styling/content from the project, etc.

Regards,
Jose García

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:07 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:43 AM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM, sppigot <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com> wrote:

This is great work! I’d like to see it made into a proposal too - it
deserves that - as it uses html5 and its very good to direct users to a
proposal on trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork so that they can see an at least see
an example of how they can use this in their own interfaces to GeoNetwork.

Cheers and thanks for this!
Simon

----- Original Message -----
From: Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 19:05
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] new UI - pull request
To: María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Devel geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net”
<geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

Hola Maria,

good to see this work on the UI proposed to GeoNetwork. Having a
quicklook, I’ve seen some minor stuff to fix (eg. NGR specific, missing
loc). I’ll try to post comments on the PR by friday.

It’s quite a major work and maybe could be proposed as a proposal [1] so
more people could have an idea of the results ? It’s only a suggestion. It
could be nice to make a list of differences - new or missing features - with
other widget UIs. This could be useful if we want at some point make this UI
the default and add the missing features if needed.

Cheers.

Francois

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

2013/3/25 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>

Hi,

I’ve got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
comments or reviews will be appreciated.

Thank you,
María.

[1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81

Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar

GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

Thanks for the comments. I’ll write a proporsal to make it more clear
and remove some custom settings.

Hi,

I’m not sure where should I put the link to the proporsal[1]. Should
it be on the table of 2.9.x[2] or not yet? And… is the proporsal ok
or should I add more info?

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/Html5UI
[2]http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel’s independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d

GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

–

GeoCat Bridge for ArcGIS allows instant publishing of data and metadata on GeoServer and GeoNetwork. Visit http://geocat.net for details.

Jose García
GeoCat bv
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
http://GeoCat.net

7

I made some more changes and added it to the 2.9.x section. What should I do to propose a votation?

···

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Jose Garcia <jose.garcia@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Maria

I think in 2.9.x section is fine to add.

About proposal content, would be good to add some screenshots, so people can check it. There’s a link to project website that originated this new UI, but the proposal has changes to remove custom styling/content from the project, etc.

Regards,
Jose García

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:07 PM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:43 AM, María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM, sppigot <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com> wrote:

This is great work! I’d like to see it made into a proposal too - it
deserves that - as it uses html5 and its very good to direct users to a
proposal on trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork so that they can see an at least see
an example of how they can use this in their own interfaces to GeoNetwork.

Cheers and thanks for this!
Simon

----- Original Message -----
From: Francois Prunayre <fx.prunayre@anonymised.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 19:05
Subject: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] new UI - pull request
To: María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Devel geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net”
<geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

Hola Maria,

good to see this work on the UI proposed to GeoNetwork. Having a
quicklook, I’ve seen some minor stuff to fix (eg. NGR specific, missing
loc). I’ll try to post comments on the PR by friday.

It’s quite a major work and maybe could be proposed as a proposal [1] so
more people could have an idea of the results ? It’s only a suggestion. It
could be nice to make a list of differences - new or missing features - with
other widget UIs. This could be useful if we want at some point make this UI
the default and add the missing features if needed.

Cheers.

Francois

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

2013/3/25 María Arias de Reyna <delawen@anonymised.com>

Hi,

I’ve got a pull request about a new UI[1] and I was wondering if I
should do something more to help the pull request to be merged. Any
comments or reviews will be appreciated.

Thank you,
María.

[1]https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/81

Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar

GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

Thanks for the comments. I’ll write a proporsal to make it more clear
and remove some custom settings.

Hi,

I’m not sure where should I put the link to the proporsal[1]. Should
it be on the table of 2.9.x[2] or not yet? And… is the proporsal ok
or should I add more info?

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/Html5UI
[2]http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals

Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013

Rise to greatness in Intel’s independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d

GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

–

GeoCat Bridge for ArcGIS allows instant publishing of data and metadata on GeoServer and GeoNetwork. Visit http://geocat.net for details.

Jose García
GeoCat bv
Veenderweg 13
6721 WD Bennekom
The Netherlands
http://GeoCat.net