[GeoNetwork-devel] Proposal: Relevance As a Percentage

hello,

I have put up the proposal for Relevance As a Percentage, here: http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/RelevancePercentage.

PSC members, please vote !

The work was originally implemented in Nationaal Georegister, http://nationaalgeoregister.nl
.

Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman

+1
Cheers,
Simon

heikki wrote:

hello,

I have put up the proposal for Relevance As a Percentage, here: RelevancePercentage – GeoNetwork opensource Developer website. <http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/PerformanceImprovementInSearch&gt;

PSC members, please vote !

The work was originally implemented in Nationaal Georegister, http://nationaalgeoregister.nl/&gt;
.

Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. Best Open Source Mac Front-Ends 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
geonetwork-devel List Signup and Options
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at GeoNetwork - Geographic Metadata Catalog download | SourceForge.net

+1.
Francois

2009/9/14 Simon Pigot <Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com>:

+1
Cheers,
Simon

heikki wrote:

hello,

I have put up the proposal for Relevance As a Percentage, here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/RelevancePercentage.
<http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/PerformanceImprovementInSearch&gt;

PSC members, please vote !

The work was originally implemented in Nationaal Georegister,
http://nationaalgeoregister.nl/&gt;
.

Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

Hi Heikki,
As discussed in the IRC meeting, I think the percentage is not contributing to a better understanding of the search results quality. I think the concept has to be improved further before we add this functionality to trunk and therefor now vote -1

My considerations as explained during the IRC meeting:
People feel that 100% is a misleading representation of the best fit search result (this also came up when discussing the percentage in our NGR Geonovum meeting).
I think we will move towards a separate module in the future that deals with ratings, reviews by users, analysis of user behavior and usage statistics
I’d rather see nothing for now until we come up with a more intuitive percentage / number / rating

Cheers,
Jeroen

On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:22 PM, heikki wrote:

hello,

I have put up the proposal for Relevance As a Percentage, here: http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/RelevancePercentage.

PSC members, please vote !

The work was originally implemented in Nationaal Georegister, http://nationaalgeoregister.nl
.

Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman

Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what’s new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

0
Patrizia

  -----Messaggio originale-----
  Da: heikki [mailto:tropicano@…31…]
  Inviato: lun 14/09/2009 13.22
  A: Devel geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  Cc:
  Oggetto: [GeoNetwork-devel] Proposal: Relevance As a Percentage
  
  hello,
  
  I have put up the proposal for Relevance As a Percentage, here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/RelevancePercentage.
<http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/PerformanceImprovementInSearch&gt;
  
  PSC members, please vote !
  
  The work was originally implemented in Nationaal Georegister,
http://nationaalgeoregister.nl/&gt;
  .
  
  Kind regards
  Heikki Doeleman

okay,

I won’t put this up for majority voting, as I’m not so fond of this one myself :-). I’ll try to convince GeoNovum to remove it from NGR in order to keep NGR code closer aligned to GN.

Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jeroen Ticheler <Jeroen.Ticheler@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Heikki,
As discussed in the IRC meeting, I think the percentage is not contributing to a better understanding of the search results quality. I think the concept has to be improved further before we add this functionality to trunk and therefor now vote -1

My considerations as explained during the IRC meeting:
People feel that 100% is a misleading representation of the best fit search result (this also came up when discussing the percentage in our NGR Geonovum meeting).
I think we will move towards a separate module in the future that deals with ratings, reviews by users, analysis of user behavior and usage statistics
I’d rather see nothing for now until we come up with a more intuitive percentage / number / rating

Cheers,
Jeroen

On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:22 PM, heikki wrote:

hello,

I have put up the proposal for Relevance As a Percentage, here: http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/RelevancePercentage.

PSC members, please vote !

The work was originally implemented in Nationaal Georegister, http://nationaalgeoregister.nl
.

Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman


Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what’s new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork