I have now posted to the Trac site the text of several proposals
discussed here previously. We welcome additional discussion and look
forward to the PSC vote, when appropriate.
I have not posted proposals concerning changes to the Z39.50 or the
thesaurus functions since there are on-going efforts that may either
duplicate the efforts or eliminate the needs entirely. I'd like to see
how those proceed before pursuing an independent effort.
I have also split out the proposals for Local Harvest and Remote
Searching into separate proposals although they were initially presented
together in my earlier emails.
Best wishes for a very happy and healthy new year to all of you here!
--
Archie
-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.
I have now posted to the Trac site the text of several proposals
discussed here previously. We welcome additional discussion and look
forward to the PSC vote, when appropriate.
For PSC vote, could you point to the proposal which are ready for vote
? could you attach patch to those proposal for a review ? Patch is not
a requirement for a proposal I think, but when we have time, it's a
nice to have for testing.
Cheers.
Francois
I have not posted proposals concerning changes to the Z39.50 or the
thesaurus functions since there are on-going efforts that may either
duplicate the efforts or eliminate the needs entirely. I'd like to see
how those proceed before pursuing an independent effort.
I have also split out the proposals for Local Harvest and Remote
Searching into separate proposals although they were initially presented
together in my earlier emails.
Best wishes for a very happy and healthy new year to all of you here!
--
Archie
-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
Yes, that's the plan and it's why I didn't actually include the Z39.50
proposal I mentioned in my initial email.
For PSC vote, could you point to the proposal which are ready for vote
? could you attach patch to those proposal for a review ? Patch is not
a requirement for a proposal I think, but when we have time, it's a
nice to have for testing.
No patches available yet - we're waiting for the PSC vote to get a
sandbox set up so we can generate them. I'll post a list of the
proposals ready for voting this week.
Thanks for the input!
--
Archie
-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.
Hi Archie,
I've created the sandbox for you. You can find it under /sandbox/fgdc_geonetwork
Please let me know if there's a requirement to have other developers added to the SVN so they can commit to the sandbox. For commit access to sandboxes the requirement is that they accept the committer guidelines and that they only commit to the sandbox.
Apologies for the delayed creation of the sandbox.
Greetings,
Jeroen
On Jan 18, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Archie Warnock wrote:
No patches available yet - we're waiting for the PSC vote to get a
sandbox set up so we can generate them. I'll post a list of the
proposals ready for voting this week.
Hi Archie,
I hope this email finds you well. We have moved the below mentioned proposals to the archive since we are not sure what the status of them is at present.
If you would still like to integrate them in GeoNetwork, please consider updating them and putting them up for vote each one individually again.
Thanks and greetings,
Jeroen
Yes, that’s the plan and it’s why I didn’t actually include the Z39.50
proposal I mentioned in my initial email.
For PSC vote, could you point to the proposal which are ready for vote
? could you attach patch to those proposal for a review ? Patch is not
a requirement for a proposal I think, but when we have time, it’s a
nice to have for testing.
No patches available yet - we’re waiting for the PSC vote to get a
sandbox set up so we can generate them. I’ll post a list of the
proposals ready for voting this week.
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world’s best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security’s most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
I think that's fine. Thanks for your patience - they sort of got away from me. Y'all generate code at an impressive pace!
Cheers to all!
Archie
On 10/2/12 5:50 AM, Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
Hi Archie,
I hope this email finds you well. We have moved the below mentioned
proposals to the archive since we are not sure what the status of them
is at present.
If you would still like to integrate them in GeoNetwork, please consider
updating them and putting them up for vote each one individually again.
Thanks and greetings,
--
Archie
-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.