[GeoNetwork-devel] Proposed enhancements to GeoNetwork

Hi all,

Doug Nebert of the FGDC has been assessing GeoNetwork for potential use
as a platform for a geospatial clearinghouse for GEOSS. He's uncovered
a few problems and some missing capabilities and has asked a team of
programmers from George Mason Univ and myself to investigate addressing
those issues.

I've already briefly discussed the proposed changes, primarily
supporting harvesting, with Jeroen and at his suggestion am going to
post our proposed efforts in a series of emails to follow this one. The
intention is to make the enhancements necessary to make GeoNetwork a
robust harvesting platform and to contribute those changes back to the
main development branch. We'll do this, once we have consensus on
changes to be made and how best to implement them, by asking Jeroen to
set up a branch sandbox from the main svn repository for us to use. We
don't wish to duplicate efforts already underway by other developers, so
we'll coordinate closely with the group here in order to make the
process as seamless as possible.

In summary, we plan on implementing modifications that would accomplish
the following:

- perform configurable harvest from remote WAF, CSW v2.0.2 (at least)
and Z39.50 sources

- process/convert/manage metadata of various formats (CSW ebRIM, mostly,
depending on existing support for FGDC, CSW ISO, etc) into ISO format

- assign collections to be harvested for local search or flagged for
remote distributed search

- migrate the existing Z39.50 code to use jzkit v2 (which I understand
Simon may have already done with BlueMEST)

- implementing an administrative function to display system logs

- adding some sort of term expansion function to the existing thesaurus
support

I'll discuss each of these in more detail in the messages that follow so
that we can discuss them individually. I'll post them to Trac, as well.

--

Archie

-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.

Hi Archie,

Just a note on JZKit2 - we have not done this for the BlueNetMEST - in the original email exchanges (see http://n2.nabble.com/Z3950-in-2-1-td3429902.html), John Hockaday suggested to Ian Ibbotson (a JZKit maintainer) that a JZKit 2 move would be much appreciated but Ian didn't respond.

Have you got an update on any progress made by Ian?

Cheers,
Simon
____________________________
From: Archie Warnock [warnock@anonymised.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 3:13 AM
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [GeoNetwork-devel] Proposed enhancements to GeoNetwork

Hi all,

Doug Nebert of the FGDC has been assessing GeoNetwork for potential use
as a platform for a geospatial clearinghouse for GEOSS. He's uncovered
a few problems and some missing capabilities and has asked a team of
programmers from George Mason Univ and myself to investigate addressing
those issues.

I've already briefly discussed the proposed changes, primarily
supporting harvesting, with Jeroen and at his suggestion am going to
post our proposed efforts in a series of emails to follow this one. The
intention is to make the enhancements necessary to make GeoNetwork a
robust harvesting platform and to contribute those changes back to the
main development branch. We'll do this, once we have consensus on
changes to be made and how best to implement them, by asking Jeroen to
set up a branch sandbox from the main svn repository for us to use. We
don't wish to duplicate efforts already underway by other developers, so
we'll coordinate closely with the group here in order to make the
process as seamless as possible.

In summary, we plan on implementing modifications that would accomplish
the following:

- perform configurable harvest from remote WAF, CSW v2.0.2 (at least)
and Z39.50 sources

- process/convert/manage metadata of various formats (CSW ebRIM, mostly,
depending on existing support for FGDC, CSW ISO, etc) into ISO format

- assign collections to be harvested for local search or flagged for
remote distributed search

- migrate the existing Z39.50 code to use jzkit v2 (which I understand
Simon may have already done with BlueMEST)

- implementing an administrative function to display system logs

- adding some sort of term expansion function to the existing thesaurus
support

I'll discuss each of these in more detail in the messages that follow so
that we can discuss them individually. I'll post them to Trac, as well.

--

Archie

-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. Best Open Source Mac Front-Ends 2024
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork

Simon.Pigot@anonymised.com wrote:

Just a note on JZKit2 - we have not done this for the BlueNetMEST -
in the original email exchanges (see
http://n2.nabble.com/Z3950-in-2-1-td3429902.html), John Hockaday
suggested to Ian Ibbotson (a JZKit maintainer) that a JZKit 2 move
would be much appreciated but Ian didn't respond.

Have you got an update on any progress made by Ian?

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the update. That's useful information for us.

No, I haven't been in contact with Ian and it doesn't appear from the
web site that there's been any activity with JZKit in a good while.
I'll drop him a line to check on the status and will report back here if
I get any information.

Even without active support, I think migrating to JZKit2 is a good idea.
I'm not quite sure yet how much effort that will entail but we really
have a critical need to harvest from Z39.50 sources and to clean up some
of the server behavior.

--

Archie

-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.

Archie Warnock wrote:

(1)

Even without active support, I think migrating to JZKit2 is a good idea.

and (2)

I'm not quite sure yet how much effort that will entail but we really
have a critical need to harvest from Z39.50 sources and to clean up some
of the server behavior.

Not obvious to me that (1) follows merely from (2).
AFAICS JZKit 2 is _different_ from JZKit 1,
not necessarily better (or worse). I don't
see any special harvest feature in JZKit 2.
You might (easily) spend weeks doing the
migration to JZKit 2 and then
find you are no better off.

Best to get Ian Ibbotson's view on this
before jumping in.

--
Richard Walker
Software Improvements Pty Ltd
Phone: +61 2 6273 2055
Fax: +61 2 6273 2082

On 11/18/09 7:41 PM, Software Improvements gn-devel wrote:

Not obvious to me that (1) follows merely from (2). AFAICS JZKit 2 is
_different_ from JZKit 1, not necessarily better (or worse). I
don't see any special harvest feature in JZKit 2. You might (easily)
spend weeks doing the migration to JZKit 2 and then find you are no
better off.

Best to get Ian Ibbotson's view on this before jumping in.

I'll touch base with him, Richard. Good points.

--
Archie

-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.

Hi all,

I am working for the Western Australian Geothermal Centre of Excellence, who are establishing a metadata catalog with GeoNetwork 2.4.1.

They came up with enhancements and modifications, which I'd like to bring forward as proposals so that they could hopefully be integrated into the trunk. One of the features seems to be already been worked on by Simon Pigot, so I'm cc'ing him here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Archie Warnock [mailto:warnock@anonymised.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 12:14 AM
To: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [GeoNetwork-devel] Proposed enhancements to GeoNetwork

Hi all,

Doug Nebert of the FGDC has been assessing GeoNetwork for
potential use
as a platform for a geospatial clearinghouse for GEOSS. He's
uncovered
a few problems and some missing capabilities and has asked a team of
programmers from George Mason Univ and myself to investigate
addressing
those issues.

I've already briefly discussed the proposed changes, primarily
supporting harvesting, with Jeroen and at his suggestion am going to
post our proposed efforts in a series of emails to follow
this one. The
intention is to make the enhancements necessary to make GeoNetwork a
robust harvesting platform and to contribute those changes back to the
main development branch. We'll do this, once we have consensus on
changes to be made and how best to implement them, by asking Jeroen to
set up a branch sandbox from the main svn repository for us
to use. We
don't wish to duplicate efforts already underway by other
developers, so
we'll coordinate closely with the group here in order to make the
process as seamless as possible.

In summary, we plan on implementing modifications that would
accomplish
the following:

- perform configurable harvest from remote WAF, CSW v2.0.2 (at least)
and Z39.50 sources

- process/convert/manage metadata of various formats (CSW
ebRIM, mostly,
depending on existing support for FGDC, CSW ISO, etc) into ISO format

- assign collections to be harvested for local search or flagged for
remote distributed search

- migrate the existing Z39.50 code to use jzkit v2 (which I understand
Simon may have already done with BlueMEST)

- implementing an administrative function to display system logs

- adding some sort of term expansion function to the existing
thesaurus
support

I'll discuss each of these in more detail in the messages
that follow so
that we can discuss them individually. I'll post them to
Trac, as well.

--

Archie

-- Archie Warnock warnock@anonymised.com
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.

--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal
Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and
deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
GeoNetwork-devel mailing list
GeoNetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork