[GeoNetwork-devel] Upgrading Lucene and Prototype

GeoNetwork GeoNetwork Developer
1

+1

geonetwork-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net дµÀ£º

Send GeoNetwork-devel mailing list submissions to
geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body ‘help’ to
geonetwork-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
geonetwork-devel-owner@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than “Re: Contents of GeoNetwork-devel digest…”
Today’s Topics:

  1. Upgrading Lucene and Prototype (heikki)
  2. Proposal to change Lucene relevance number (heikki)
  3. Re: Upgrading Lucene and Prototype (Francois-Xavier Prunayre)
  4. Re: Upgrading Lucene and Prototype (Simon Pigot)
  5. Re: Upgrading Lucene and Prototype (Archie Warnock)
  6. Re: Upgrading Lucene and Prototype (Jeroen Ticheler)
  7. Re: Upgrading Lucene and Prototype (Andrea Carboni)
  8. Re: Proposal to change Lucene relevance number (Archie Warnock)
  9. request for a sandbox access for Lorenzo Amato (lorenzo amato)
    ·¢¼þÈË: heikki tropicano@anonymised.com
    ÊÕ¼þÈË: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
    ÈÕÆÚ: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:42:58 +0200
    Ö÷Ìâ: [GeoNetwork-devel] Upgrading Lucene and Prototype

hello list,

I’d like to upgrade Lucene to version 2.3.2, which has bug fixes to our current version 2.3.0.

And I’d like to upgrade Prototype to version 1.6.0.2, which has more functionality than our current 1.5.1.1 – specifically I’m using Element.clonePosition(), which was introduced with version 1.6.

I’ll test both changes in the work I do for a Dutch project that uses GeoNetwork. If I see no problems after a while, does anyone have objections ?

regards
heikki
·¢¼þÈË: heikki tropicano@anonymised.com
ÊÕ¼þÈË: “geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net”
geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
ÈÕÆÚ: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:48:18 +0200
Ö÷Ìâ: [GeoNetwork-devel] Proposal to change Lucene relevance number

Hello lists,

a Dutch project that’s using GeoNetwork wants to show the Lucene relevance ranking expressed as a percentage on the search results page.

The Lucene relevance ranking, as such, is a number between 0 and 1 that has no meaning to a user.

I’ve implemented it for the Dutch project such that the highest result’s relevance ranking is taken as “100%”, and all other results’ relevances are normalised with respect to that.

Is anyone interested in that I merge this to the trunk ? Anyone out there doing anything with the current relevance ranking (such as, displaying it) that might be affected ?

regards
heikki doeleman
·¢¼þÈË: Francois-Xavier Prunayre francois-xavier.prunayre@anonymised.com
³­ËÍ: geonetwork-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
ÊÕ¼þÈË: tropicano@anonymised.com
ÈÕÆÚ: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:24:42 +0200
Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Upgrading Lucene and Prototype

Hi Heikki, I’ve also updated prototype for a project in France and find no
trouble updating this … so +1 for the update.

Ciao

Francois

Quoting heikki

ÑÅ»¢ÓÊÏ䣬ÄúµÄÖÕÉúÓÊÏ䣡