Recently we just upgraded our systems and built a multiple node
infrastructure to support our web services. I just wondering whether
multiple geonetworkapps can access the same databases (and file systems).
Googling online and searching the mail list. From the legacy WIKI, I found
this:
I think it should be fine. All you need to do is to make sure your database
allow concurrent connection, which should be the default setting in most db.
For example, the harvest setting, and the way db ID is created and the Lucene
indexing creation. Would you mind to point me to the right document for me
to figure out how these road barriers are solved?
Thank you,
Regards,
Yunwei
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Cody <yjiang8@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Yunwei,
I think it should be fine. All you need to do is to make sure your database
allow concurrent connection, which should be the default setting in most
db.
Oh, I thought you were only talking about concurrent searching. For multiple
inserting or deleting, I am not sure it is supported by GNK at this point.
However, I think it is supported at least at the thread level, since it
allows user to set the number of threads in its setting. So, if you really
wanna do this, you may need to look into the code and extend it (Yes,
concurrent indexing is a big problem).
Oh, I thought you were only talking about concurrent searching. For
multiple
inserting or deleting, I am not sure it is supported by GNK at this point.
However, I think it is supported at least at the thread level, since it
allows user to set the number of threads in its setting. So, if you really
wanna do this, you may need to look into the code and extend it (Yes,
concurrent indexing is a big problem).
> Oh, I thought you were only talking about concurrent searching. For
> multiple
> inserting or deleting, I am not sure it is supported by GNK at this
point.
> However, I think it is supported at least at the thread level, since it
> allows user to set the number of threads in its setting. So, if you
really
> wanna do this, you may need to look into the code and extend it (Yes,
> concurrent indexing is a big problem).
>
>
>
> -----
> Geospatial discovery and cyberinfrastructure
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/multiple-instances-of-geonetwork-one-database-tp5209780p5209856.html
> Sent from the GeoNetwork users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> GeoNetwork-users mailing list
> GeoNetwork-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-users
> GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork
>