Hi Chris,
I see your point ad I agree on it but the fundings I have right now
for the branch require me to come up with a new version pretty soon,
therefore for this new version I do not think I will be able to
re-branch from 1.4.x.
As soon as the new version will be mature mature, we will switch to
1.4.x for sure.
I know I have been quite absent from the various discussions lately,
but I have been working behind the curtains in order to convince
people in nato to adopt, where possible, the geoserver/geotools stack.
I am also trying to get involved Pisa state university (actually I
have a guy doing his master thesis with me on coverages). Things seem
to be turning fine even if slowly since these kind of organization
usually move very slowly.
Simone.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Simone Giannecchini
Software Engineer
Freelance Consultant
http://simboss.wordpress.com/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
On 2/21/06, Chris Holmes <cholmes@...13...> wrote:
Even if it doesn't become the new trunk immediately, the WCS releases
should still be aligned with 1.4.x, since it will eventually become
trunk, and WCS won't be released in the core GeoServer releases until
that point. All experimental and future work should be done against the
latest GeoServer development, if it wants to be released mainstream
eventually, whether we call it 1.4.x or trunk.
Alexander Petkov wrote:
> Simone:
>
> If 1.4.x becomes the new trunk, will the WCS releases be aligned with
> it from then on?
>
> Alex
>
> On 2/21/06, Simone Giannecchini <simboss1@...403...> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>I think your recommendation sounds great. I have two small questions
>>which might have been already answered.
>>
>>1> Is there a road map for 1.4.x?
>>
>>2>In case I had some minor improvements for the 1.3.x WMS what
>>proceudre should I follow? I guess just committing them is not the
>>right one :-).
>>
>>Simone.
>>
>>°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
>>Simone Giannecchini
>>Software Engineer
>>Freelance Consultant
>>
>>http://simboss.wordpress.com/
>>
>>°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
>>
>>
>>On 2/21/06, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@...13...> wrote:
>>
>>>Good, always good to know i am not totally out to lunch :). And your
>>>opinion definitley carries weight here Saul.
>>>
>>>-Justin
>>>
>>>Saul Farber wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm not sure my opinion carries a lot of weight, but what you propose is
>>>>pretty much what I've come to regard as standard operating procedure.
>>>>I'm kind-of surprised you guys didn't put 1.3.0 (--> 1.3.x) onto a
>>>>branch earlier and then just do the 1.4.x refactor right on the trunk.
>>>>
>>>>I think both makes sense and is a good idea.
>>>>
>>>>Then again, SOP hasn't ever created anything halfway as cool as
>>>>geoserver before!
>>>>
>>>>--saul
>>>>
>>>>Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>With 1.3.0 out, and development ramping up on 1.4.x, i think we need
>>>>>to decide how things will be organized in the repository in terms of
>>>>>branches vs trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>>Right now things are laid out as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>>1.3.x = trunk
>>>>>1.4.x = branch
>>>>>complex-features = branch of 1.4.x
>>>>>
>>>>>So I guess the big question is should 1.4.x be made the new trunk and
>>>>>1.3.x put out on a maintenance branch?
>>>>>
>>>>>My recommendation would be as follows (and please feel free to disagree)
>>>>>
>>>>>1.4.x = trunk
>>>>>1.3.x = branch
>>>>>complex-features = branch
>>>>>
>>>>>Since 1.4.x is really just 1.3.x. + spring container + code broken up
>>>>>into modules it is still quite "stable". It passes all unit tests and
>>>>>ogc cite tests. So having it as trunk isn't really all that different
>>>>>then the way things are today. The only big thing is the new build
>>>>>system which a few people have successfully been able to use.
>>>>>
>>>>>Since the complex stuff is going to be pretty shaky for a couple of
>>>>>weeks to come, it needs to stay out on a branch for a little while yet
>>>>>before getting merged back onto 1.4.x / trunk / whatever we decide.
>>>>>
>>>>>So this email is just really to start up conversation about what
>>>>>people think. And possibly come to come to a resolution about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>-Justin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
>>>>>files
>>>>>for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>>>>>searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>>>>>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>>>Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>>>for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>>>searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>>>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>>for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>>searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
>>_______________________________________________
>>Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>
> N�HY隊X���'���u���[�������
> ަ�k��!�� �W�~�鮆�zk��C� 塧m����@^ǚ��^��z�Z�f�z� j�!�x2���a����ɫ,��� a{a� �,�H��4�m�����Z�� jY�w��ǥrge�I"w]7�}��ݷӏ:u�u�^��g����z�^��fj)b� b�ў�ǫ���z�+-��.�ǟ�� ��a��l��b��,���y�+���b��?�+-�w��a����z�^�
--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
thoughts at: http://cholmes.wordpress.com
--
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Simone Giannecchini
Software Engineer
Freelance Consultant
http://simboss.wordpress.com/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°