Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
Jody Garnett
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: "Geoserver-devel" <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. --
Jody Garnett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo <benk@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
I'd be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be 'accepted' and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: "Ben Khoo" <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: "Geoserver-devel" <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: "Geoserver-devel" < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. --
Jody Garnett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Nightly builds are always available - because testing a nightly build is a common request we made the links easy to find on the project home page.
And yes if it is fixed in a nightly then it is fixed in 2.6.0.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo <benk@anonymised.com> wrote:
I’d be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be ‘accepted’ and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>To: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
I would like Andrea's opinion on this XSS security issue:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6632
Any fix would affect the WMS implementation; this suggests to me that an RC2 might be warranted if this issue is fixed.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 27/08/14 13:34, Jody Garnett wrote:
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from
the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme
fixes - which should not require an RC2.
--
Jody Garnett------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Mineral Resources Flagship
Australian Resources Research Centre
Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called “master” now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo <benk@anonymised.com> wrote:
I’d be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be ‘accepted’ and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>To: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Ah! Thanks for that 
I was just going to point out the 404.
Downloading now ...
The reason I was checking before if I could pull down the current nightly was that I wasn't sure if it had been 24 hours since Kevin put in the fix. So I wasn't sure if his fix had flowed into the nightly build yet.
Cheers
Ben
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: "Ben Khoo" <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: "Geoserver-devel" <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called "master" now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
I'd be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be 'accepted' and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: "Ben Khoo" < benk@anonymised.com >
Cc: "Geoserver-devel" < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: "Geoserver-devel" < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. --
Jody Garnett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Thanks Jody and Kevin,
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is fixed in the nightly build.
I have added a comment to the ticket to that effect.
Thanks again!
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Khoo" <benk@anonymised.com>
To: "Jody Garnett" <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Cc: "Geoserver-devel" <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 2:03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Ah! Thanks for that I was just going to point out the 404.
Downloading now ...
The reason I was checking before if I could pull down the current nightly was that I wasn't sure if it had been 24 hours since Kevin put in the fix. So I wasn't sure if his fix had flowed into the nightly build yet.
Cheers
Ben
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: "Ben Khoo" <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: "Geoserver-devel" <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called "master" now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
I'd be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be 'accepted' and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: "Ben Khoo" < benk@anonymised.com >
Cc: "Geoserver-devel" < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
------------------------------------
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: "Geoserver-devel" < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. --
Jody Garnett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Hi,
I committed a fix for https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6245 after RC1.
Mauro
2014-08-27 8:13 GMT+02:00 Ben Khoo <benk@…1762…>:
Thanks Jody and Kevin,
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is fixed in the nightly build.
I have added a comment to the ticket to that effect.
Thanks again!
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
To: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 2:03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Ah! Thanks for that
Downloading now …
The reason I was checking before if I could pull down the current nightly was that I wasn’t sure if it had been 24 hours since Kevin put in the fix. So I wasn’t sure if his fix had flowed into the nightly build yet.
Cheers
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com2…>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called “master” now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
I’d be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be ‘accepted’ and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >To: “Ben Khoo” < benk@anonymised.com62… >
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Do you have someone on the user list to test a nightly build Mauro? Or will we need to make an RC2…
Jody Garnett
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <maurobartolomeoli@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
I committed a fix for https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6245 after RC1.Mauro
2014-08-27 8:13 GMT+02:00 Ben Khoo <benk@…1762…>:
Thanks Jody and Kevin,
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is fixed in the nightly build.
I have added a comment to the ticket to that effect.
Thanks again!
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
To: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 2:03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Ah! Thanks for that
Downloading now …
The reason I was checking before if I could pull down the current nightly was that I wasn’t sure if it had been 24 hours since Kevin put in the fix. So I wasn’t sure if his fix had flowed into the nightly build yet.
Cheers
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called “master” now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
I’d be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be ‘accepted’ and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >To: “Ben Khoo” < benk@anonymised.com >
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Hi, I am not sure if Jonathan Moules (who created the JIRA) is around to give the nightly a try.
Mauro
2014-08-27 9:47 GMT+02:00 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>:
Do you have someone on the user list to test a nightly build Mauro? Or will we need to make an RC2…
Jody Garnett
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <maurobartolomeoli@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
I committed a fix for https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6245 after RC1.Mauro
2014-08-27 8:13 GMT+02:00 Ben Khoo <benk@…1762…>:
Thanks Jody and Kevin,
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is fixed in the nightly build.
I have added a comment to the ticket to that effect.
Thanks again!
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
To: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 2:03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Ah! Thanks for that
Downloading now …
The reason I was checking before if I could pull down the current nightly was that I wasn’t sure if it had been 24 hours since Kevin put in the fix. So I wasn’t sure if his fix had flowed into the nightly build yet.
Cheers
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
To: “Ben Khoo” <benk@anonymised.com>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called “master” now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
I’d be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be ‘accepted’ and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >To: “Ben Khoo” < benk@anonymised.com >
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@anonymised.com…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@anonymised.com >
To: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Hi,
What is the right URL to download the nightly as zip? Link from http://geoserver.org/release/master/ points to http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/master/ext-latest/geoserver-2.6-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip which gives Not Found.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Mauro Bartolomeoli wrote:
Hi, I am not sure if Jonathan Moules (who created the JIRA) is around to give the nightly a try.
Mauro
2014-08-27 9:47 GMT+02:00 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@…403…>:
Do you have someone on the user list to test a nightly build Mauro? Or will we need to make an RC2…
Jody Garnett
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <maurobartolomeoli@…403…> wrote:
Hi,
I committed a fix for https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6245 after RC1.
Mauro
2014-08-27 8:13 GMT+02:00 Ben Khoo <benk@…1762…>:
Thanks Jody and Kevin,
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is fixed in the nightly build.
I have added a comment to the ticket to that effect.
Thanks again!
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@…1762…----- Original Message -----
From: “Ben Khoo” <benk@…1762…>
To: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@…403…>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 2:03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Ah! Thanks for that
Downloading now …
The reason I was checking before if I could pull down the current nightly was that I wasn’t sure if it had been 24 hours since Kevin put in the fix. So I wasn’t sure if his fix had flowed into the nightly build yet.
Cheers
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@…1762…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” <jody.garnett@…403…>
To: “Ben Khoo” <benk@…1762…>
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:58:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Actually I got a bit confused, the website points to a nightly for 2.7.x as that is called “master” now.
Here is a link to the 2.6 nightly releases: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@…1762… > wrote:
I’d be happy to test the new nightly. Can I pull it down off the website now?
Maybe I am just a little confused. If it gets fixed in the nightly, does that mean that it will be fixed in the official Geoserver 2.6? I interpreted the previous email to mean that the current RC-1 will be ‘accepted’ and be renamed as Geoserver 2.6 (official). In other words, 2.6 RC1 == 2.6.0
Cheers
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@…1762…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@…403… >To: “Ben Khoo” < benk@…1762… >
Cc: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?It looks like Kevin Smith may of fixed that for you? Are you able to test a nightly build and confirm? I am sure Kevin could use the feedback.
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Ben Khoo < benk@…1762… > wrote:
Hi All,
Speaking personally, I think that https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6631 is quite a serious issue (in terms of functionality). This issue would certainly prevent me from being able to use Geoserver 2.6 - unless there is a workaround?
Ben
Ben Khoo
Gaia Resources
p +61 8 9227 7309
w www.gaiaresources.com.au
e ben.khoo@…1762…----- Original Message -----
From: “Jody Garnett” < jody.garnett@…403… >
To: “Geoserver-devel” < geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2014 1:34:45 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] 2.6-RC2 not needed?Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2. –
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
RC1 had a pretty serious blocker in it, it has been resolved (thanks Andrea) but not sure if that warrants another release candidate or not.
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-6625
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2.
Jody Garnett
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
Justin Deoliveira
VP Engineering | Boundless
jdeolive@anonymised.com
@boundlessgeo
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
wrote:
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from
the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes
- which should not require an RC2.
I was wondering also about the timeframe angle.... the RC2 should be
September 3rd, if we want to make final during
FOSS4G that would be the 12th.... a bit tight, but maybe we can fit it
Cheers
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
So far it seems some important issues have been fixed since RC1 - but none of the developers seems passionate about getting in another round of community testing.
Community testing has also dropped off (the RC1 is getting bout half the downloads as the beta - and no feedback about RC1 on the user list).
The beta and RC1 did its job of catching our build issues and the installation issues around the use of Java 7. I expect some of the Java 7 docs written are now out of date
The issues mentioned thus far can be verified using a nightly build. If windows or mac installer needed more work it would be worth an RC2.
With respect to timing, I think we should either make the RC2 this weekend or get over it.
Jody Garnett
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:
Watching the download status for 2.6-beta and 2.6-RC1, and judging from the lack of feedback it appears an RC2 will not be needed.
The only changes I know are in the pipe are documentation and readme fixes - which should not require an RC2.
I was wondering also about the timeframe angle… the RC2 should be September 3rd, if we want to make final during
FOSS4G that would be the 12th… a bit tight, but maybe we can fit it
Cheers
Andrea
–
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
wrote:
So far it seems some important issues have been fixed since RC1 - but none
of the developers seems passionate about getting in another round of
community testing.Community testing has also dropped off (the RC1 is getting bout half the
downloads as the beta - and no feedback about RC1 on the user list).The beta and RC1 did its job of catching our build issues and the
installation issues around the use of Java 7. I expect some of the Java 7
docs written are now out of dateThe issues mentioned thus far can be verified using a nightly build. If
windows or mac installer needed more work it would be worth an RC2.With respect to timing, I think we should either make the RC2 this weekend
or get over it.
I'd really love to hear what other core devs think about the issue.
Anyways, during the weekend I'm going to try and have a look at the WMS
cascading issue, it's the only one I have on the radar
Cheers
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Andrea Aime wrote:
Anyways, during the weekend I'm going to try and have a look at the WMS cascading issue, it's the only one I have on the radar
I can reproduce the issue. I believe that Geoserver is picking up the first SRS that the remote server is advertizing and what I set from the GUI does not have any effect.
In addition, if I try to create a WMS store and cascade the service as WMS 1.3.0 Geoserver is sending this request when I press the Save button
service=WMS&version=1.3.0&request=GetSchemaExtension
That fails with our WMS. However, with WMS 1.1.1 I can create the store.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
More info
In the data_dir the wmslayer.xml looks right with EPSG:3067 as native SRS
EPSG:3067
-
-63388.6
840946.0
6560320.0
7991820.0
EPSG:3067
…
FORCE_DECLARED
However, when I do GetMaps in EPSG:3067 GS 2.6-Snaphot from yesterday is sending EPSG:2393 requests and reprojects maps into EPSG:3067. The remote service support EPSG:2393 and EPSG:3067 and they appear in that order in GetCapabilities.
-Jukka-
Anyways, during the weekend I’m going to try and have a look at the WMS cascading issue, it’s the only one I have on the radar
I can reproduce the issue. I believe that Geoserver is picking up the first SRS that the remote server is advertizing and what I set from the GUI does not have any effect.
In addition, if I try to create a WMS store and cascade the service as WMS 1.3.0 Geoserver is sending this request when I press the Save button
service=WMS&version=1.3.0&request=GetSchemaExtension
That fails with our WMS. However, with WMS 1.1.1 I can create the store.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Rahkonen Jukka (Tike) <
jukka.rahkonen@anonymised.com> wrote:
------------------------------
Andrea Aime wrote:> Anyways, during the weekend I'm going to try and have a look at the WMS
cascading issue, it's the only one I have on the radarI can reproduce the issue. I believe that Geoserver is picking up the
first SRS that the remote server is advertizing and what I set from the GUI
does not have any effect.
This is normal, but the code should try to ask the server for the same srs
you asked to GeoServer, if supported.
We never supported choosing which srs you make requests to the remote
server into.
In addition, if I try to create a WMS store and cascade the service as WMS
1.3.0 Geoserver is sending this request when I press the Save button
service=WMS&version=1.3.0&request=GetSchemaExtension
This is new to me, no idea what a GetSchemaExtension is. Jody should be
more familiar with the code,
I've just hammered it enough to make it work in the common cases
Cheers
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------