I recently merged the change for GEOS-7960 to master and was wondering about a backport since it’s not a bug fix. There are also technically some api additions as well. Not sure what the policy is on back porting these types of things so thought I would ask. If it’s not appropriate that is fine, I can work with a local patch, albeit less ideal.
Hey guys, didn’t hear any feedback on this so used by judgement and went ahead and back ported to 2.10. The change is pretty small so will be easy to back out if folks think it’s not appropriate.
I recently merged the change for GEOS-7960 to master and was wondering about a backport since it’s not a bug fix. There are also technically some api additions as well. Not sure what the policy is on back porting these types of things so thought I would ask. If it’s not appropriate that is fine, I can work with a local patch, albeit less ideal.
I recently merged the change for GEOS-7960 to master and was wondering about a backport since it’s not a bug fix. There are also technically some api additions as well. Not sure what the policy is on back porting these types of things so thought I would ask. If it’s not appropriate that is fine, I can work with a local patch, albeit less ideal.
I recently merged the change for GEOS-7960 to master and was wondering about a backport since it’s not a bug fix. There are also technically some api additions as well. Not sure what the policy is on back porting these types of things so thought I would ask. If it’s not appropriate that is fine, I can work with a local patch, albeit less ideal.