[Geoserver-devel] Backporting the KML centroid improvements

GeoServer GeoServer Developer
1

Hi folks,

I’m interested in backporting the work I did for GSIP 160, the KML placemark placement stuff. Any objections? As a reminder all the options are additive so it doesn’t change any of the default behaviour, so it should be pretty innocuous.

Thanks!

-Justin

2

Sounds fine Justin; thanks for the contribution.

···

On 1 August 2017 at 19:32, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi folks,

I’m interested in backporting the work I did for GSIP 160, the KML placemark placement stuff. Any objections? As a reminder all the options are additive so it doesn’t change any of the default behaviour, so it should be pretty innocuous.

Thanks!

-Justin

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.com.366…sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

–
Jody Garnett

3

Thanks Jody! The work has backported to 2.11.

···

–
Jody Garnett

On 1 August 2017 at 19:32, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi folks,

I’m interested in backporting the work I did for GSIP 160, the KML placemark placement stuff. Any objections? As a reminder all the options are additive so it doesn’t change any of the default behaviour, so it should be pretty innocuous.

Thanks!

-Justin

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world’s most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel