Thanks, very much, Justin.
Andrea gave us a summary of his investigations at Tuesday's meeting:
CITE for WFS 2.0
----------------
Half an answer from Andrea:
- three weekends work, but encountered CITE test bugs
- Andrea believes it needs new CITE engine, must upgrade all
- can pass with noncompliant code
- someone also has to pay for the "official seal", maybe we can get help from OSGeo
- some bugs fixed, moving target
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 04/02/14 23:54, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
I don't specifically have a mandate to do so but I think Andrea has been
spending some time on this. Unfortunately keeping up to date with cite
tests and the cite engine (especially newer test suites that are usually
ripe with bugs) is a large undertaking. I am happy to volunteer what
time I can to help but I don't think i'll be able to champion the effort
unless Boundless gets a client willing to pay for it.
Perhaps if there is interest, Andrea, myself, and yourself could tag
team the issues to make it a more attainable goal.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com <mailto:Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>> wrote:
Justin,
are there any plans to add more CITE tests such as WFS 2.0 to our
testing suite?
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
--
*Justin Deoliveira*
Vice President, Engineering | Boundless
jdeolive@anonymised.com <mailto:jdeolive@anonymised.com>
@j_deolive <https://twitter.com/j_deolive>
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre