Hi,
I've heard that complex attributes are on the way (in a branch or so), are
these works officially avaiable ?
I've to implement an WFS 3.1.x application schema featuring featues with
complex attributes, so I'm not able to use the standard
SimpleFeatureType/SimpleFeature scenario.
kind regards
manfred
Ben will reply with more details but yes,the work is going on on trunk, the unstable development branch. Ben has been doing some great work there moving toward complex feature support.
odi wrote:
Hi,
I've heard that complex attributes are on the way (in a branch or so), are these works officially avaiable ?
I've to implement an WFS 3.1.x application schema featuring featues with complex attributes, so I'm not able to use the standard SimpleFeatureType/SimpleFeature scenario.kind regards
manfred------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Please consider identifying the target schema, so the community has a
better sense of the emerging requirements. given that you havce
targetted WFS 3.1 - I presume you mean GML 3.1 - I guess its not an
INSPIRE schema?
Iif you are really keen on it working out of the box when it comes,
compare the test cases in the app-schemas GeoTools module against your
schema to see if there are cases and data types for which no unit test
has been made.
It is possible to start testing using the Geotools environment if you
are willing to invest in running it under eclipse. I think it is
nearly possible to do it in Geoserver - Ben has been doing som work on
setting up test cases for Geoserver, but I dont think we have a easy
to use test configuration you can tweak yet - but this will be a
priority th
Rob Atkinson
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:04 AM, odi <odix@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
I've heard that complex attributes are on the way (in a branch or so), are
these works officially avaiable ?
I've to implement an WFS 3.1.x application schema featuring featues with
complex attributes, so I'm not able to use the standard
SimpleFeatureType/SimpleFeature scenario.kind regards
manfred------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
odi wrote:
I've heard that complex attributes are on the way (in a branch or so), are these works officially avaiable ?
Support for complex features is under active development on trunk. There is as yet no official release that supports complex features.
There is a fork of the 1.6 branch that has some support for complex features. It is unsupported. No further development is being done on this fork (the underlying code has been ported to trunk). The WAR file may be obtained here:
https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/twiki/bin/view/Infosrvices/GeoserverCommunitySchemasDownloads
Associated configurations are here:
https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/twiki/bin/view/Infosrvices/GeoserverGeoscimlTestbed3Downloads
Note well the outstanding issues:
https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/twiki/bin/view/Infosrvices/GeoserverGeoscimlTestbed3Issues
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Australian Resources Research Centre
26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia
your right, it's a GML 3.1 application schema, maybe I'm lost in specifications
Manfred Odenstein
Am Mittwoch, 4. März 2009 23:01:55 schrieb Rob Atkinson:
Please consider identifying the target schema, so the community has a
better sense of the emerging requirements. given that you havce
targetted WFS 3.1 - I presume you mean GML 3.1 - I guess its not an
INSPIRE schema?Iif you are really keen on it working out of the box when it comes,
compare the test cases in the app-schemas GeoTools module against your
schema to see if there are cases and data types for which no unit test
has been made.It is possible to start testing using the Geotools environment if you
are willing to invest in running it under eclipse. I think it is
nearly possible to do it in Geoserver - Ben has been doing som work on
setting up test cases for Geoserver, but I dont think we have a easy
to use test configuration you can tweak yet - but this will be a
priority thRob Atkinson
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:04 AM, odi <odix@anonymised.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've heard that complex attributes are on the way (in a branch or so),
> are these works officially avaiable ?
> I've to implement an WFS 3.1.x application schema featuring featues with
> complex attributes, so I'm not able to use the standard
> SimpleFeatureType/SimpleFeature scenario.
>
> kind regards
> manfred
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San
> Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open
> Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs
> with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the
> registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel