Do we have any interest in having Andrea sign this thing (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoservices_REST_API) as GeoServer project officer or some such?
Sorry I did not think of adding it to today’s meeting.
Jody Garnett
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>wrote:
Do we have any interest in having Andrea sign this thing (
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoservices_REST_API) as GeoServer project
officer or some such?Sorry I did not think of adding it to today's meeting.
I believe everybody should be free to decide whether to sign it or not...
me included :-p
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com>wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>wrote:
Do we have any interest in having Andrea sign this thing (
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoservices_REST_API) as GeoServer project
officer or some such?Sorry I did not think of adding it to today's meeting.
I believe everybody should be free to decide whether to sign it or not...
me included :-p
I definitely agree with Andrea, people can sign as individual contributors,
I don't think we should try to make a statement as a project.
Cheers
Andrea--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
That is cool Andrea, I just had Cameron from work pestering me.
I kind of feel Chris Holmes feedback on geopackage is more of a hit to OGC credibility then this thing (i.e. out of touch).
Still to give 'em credit they do speak in the same style as the ISO standards guys. A different crew is needed to bring it home to developers.
–
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 11:27 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:
Do we have any interest in having Andrea sign this thing (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoservices_REST_API) as GeoServer project officer or some such?
Sorry I did not think of adding it to today’s meeting.
I believe everybody should be free to decide whether to sign it or not… me included :-p
Cheers
Andrea–
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
I have been out of touch in this area for a while and just coming back in because I am working on a specificaton outside the geospatial area (for knowledge bases, that may or may not be spatially-aware), that is considering adopting the WPS either as is, or as a model.
I notice a deep divide between the ESRI GP Service, which dives right into specific processes, and WPS, which has the elegant abstract level that has caught our attention.
Some comments regarding this controversy talk about the W*S being also "broken", and the efforts underway to fix them. I can think of a few things about WFS that could fall into that category, but I am curious if such criticisms also apply to WPS, from your experience.
Best regards, Tara
+1.
On 14/05/13 02:26, Chris Holmes wrote:
I definitely agree with Andrea, people can sign as individual
contributors, I don't think we should try to make a statement as a project.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre