[Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

GeoServer GeoServer Developer
1

Hi,
so when it is that the 2.0.2 release is scheduled?
Next week? The week after the next?

We should advise users to start hitting the nightly
build harder and fix whatever high profile bugs
are still lurking in the code base

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

2

Andrea,

how about everyone starts testing nightlies next week (10 May). We (CSIRO) tag/build/upload on or about 17 May, and everybody tests the release artifacts that week, and we announce the release on 21 May if all goes to plan.

That would be the end of the week after next. Does that sound OK?

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 07/05/10 17:26, Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
so when it is that the 2.0.2 release is scheduled?
Next week? The week after the next?

We should advise users to start hitting the nightly
build harder and fix whatever high profile bugs
are still lurking in the code base

Cheers
Andrea

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

3

I am going to try and make a uDig RC3 next week as well; so I am up for tagging and build GeoTools.
Jody

On 07/05/2010, at 5:41 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:

Andrea,

how about everyone starts testing nightlies next week (10 May). We
(CSIRO) tag/build/upload on or about 17 May, and everybody tests the
release artifacts that week, and we announce the release on 21 May if
all goes to plan.

That would be the end of the week after next. Does that sound OK?

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 07/05/10 17:26, Andrea Aime wrote:

Hi,
so when it is that the 2.0.2 release is scheduled?
Next week? The week after the next?

We should advise users to start hitting the nightly
build harder and fix whatever high profile bugs
are still lurking in the code base

Cheers
Andrea

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

4

Hi Everyone,

I am Victor, working for CSIRO and will be doing the release for GeoServer
2.0.2 with Ben and Rini's help. Below will be tentatively the timeline for
this release unless there are issues that forbids this. We will adjust the
dates as necessary.

Now - 16th May 10 : Finalise and clean up any outstanding issues
17th May 10 : tag/build/upload
17th May 10 - 21th May 10 : Testing (once tag have been build)
21st May 10 : Announcement and official release

GeoServer Version: 2.0.2
GeoTool(dependency) Version: 2.6.3 (Is there any release plans for 2.6.4?)

Please correct me if there are any issue/mistake with the above plan :slight_smile:

We would like to urge everyone to start testing the nightly build from now
till the 16th May 2010.

I will keep everyone updated and informed on progress via this thread

Andrea Aime-4 wrote:

Hi,
so when it is that the 2.0.2 release is scheduled?
Next week? The week after the next?

We should advise users to start hitting the nightly
build harder and fix whatever high profile bugs
are still lurking in the code base

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28520118.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

5

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

Hi Everyone,

I am Victor, working for CSIRO and will be doing the release for GeoServer
2.0.2 with Ben and Rini's help. Below will be tentatively the timeline for
this release unless there are issues that forbids this. We will adjust the
dates as necessary.

Now - 16th May 10 : Finalise and clean up any outstanding issues
17th May 10 : tag/build/upload
17th May 10 - 21th May 10 : Testing (once tag have been build)
21st May 10 : Announcement and official release

GeoServer Version: 2.0.2
GeoTool(dependency) Version: 2.6.3 (Is there any release plans for 2.6.4?)

Releasing GeoTools is part of the duties of a GeoServer release.
Very often a bug closing/new feature in GeoServer requires changes
in Geotools, as a result we never managed to stay on a given Geotools
release long and we always target SNAPSHOT.

This also makes it involved to do the releases. Just releasing GeoTools
and then starting to do CITE tests for GeoServer often proves paiful,
as you might find a CITE test failing due to a behavior change in
GeoTools, you have to go back, fix, re-release.

So what we've done in the past was to tag GeoTools (but not release it),
start testing it, make sere everything is ok on the GeoServer side with
all the tests with have to run (CITE, interactive, whatnot),
and finally release both.

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

6

There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :slight_smile:

So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x on friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
I will warn the geotools list now.

Jody

On 11/05/2010, at 3:40 PM, VT@anonymised.com wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I am Victor, working for CSIRO and will be doing the release for GeoServer
2.0.2 with Ben and Rini's help. Below will be tentatively the timeline for
this release unless there are issues that forbids this. We will adjust the
dates as necessary.

Now - 16th May 10 : Finalise and clean up any outstanding issues
17th May 10 : tag/build/upload
17th May 10 - 21th May 10 : Testing (once tag have been build)
21st May 10 : Announcement and official release

GeoServer Version: 2.0.2
GeoTool(dependency) Version: 2.6.3 (Is there any release plans for 2.6.4?)

Please correct me if there are any issue/mistake with the above plan :slight_smile:

We would like to urge everyone to start testing the nightly build from now
till the 16th May 2010.

I will keep everyone updated and informed on progress via this thread

Andrea Aime-4 wrote:

Hi,
so when it is that the 2.0.2 release is scheduled?
Next week? The week after the next?

We should advise users to start hitting the nightly
build harder and fix whatever high profile bugs
are still lurking in the code base

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28520118.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

7

Jody Garnett ha scritto:

There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :slight_smile:

So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x on friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
I will warn the geotools list now.

Mind, if you release before CITE testing is done there is a change
we'll have to re-release again to fix issues there.

See my other mail for a process that has worked well enough in the
past

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

8

I understand that we will be tagging Geotool and GeoServer for release and
will be doing all tests based on the tagged revision. Release will be made
on the tagged revision once all tests have passed :slight_smile:

Andrea Aime-4 wrote:

Jody Garnett ha scritto:

There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together
:slight_smile:

So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch
2.6.x on friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
I will warn the geotools list now.

Mind, if you release before CITE testing is done there is a change
we'll have to re-release again to fix issues there.

See my other mail for a process that has worked well enough in the
past

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28521071.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

9

I am on it Andrea :slight_smile: I will deploy the jars and wait to hear back from both CITE tests and those trying out the artifacts.

Jody

On 11/05/2010, at 5:52 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:

Jody Garnett ha scritto:

There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :slight_smile:
So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x on friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
I will warn the geotools list now.

Mind, if you release before CITE testing is done there is a change
we'll have to re-release again to fix issues there.

See my other mail for a process that has worked well enough in the
past

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

10

Gentle reminder that Geoserver will be tagged for release on 17th May 2010
assuming the build is fine

Jody Garnett-3 wrote:

I am on it Andrea :slight_smile: I will deploy the jars and wait to hear back from
both CITE tests and those trying out the artifacts.

Jody

On 11/05/2010, at 5:52 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:

Jody Garnett ha scritto:

There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together
:slight_smile:
So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch
2.6.x on friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
I will warn the geotools list now.

Mind, if you release before CITE testing is done there is a change
we'll have to re-release again to fix issues there.

See my other mail for a process that has worked well enough in the
past

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28556872.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11

I am going to start the building and tagging process of Geoserver now
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28578925.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

12

That is great; the geotools 2.6.4 deploy went out of the weekend and I will be releasing off it shortly.

Note: this may mean we need to make a 2.6.5 later in the month when you are ready.

Jody

On 17/05/2010, at 12:29 PM, VT@anonymised.com wrote:

I am going to start the building and tagging process of Geoserver now
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28578925.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

13

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

I am going to start the building and tagging process of Geoserver now

Sorry but... are all CITE tests passing? We don't do releases with CITE
test failures (actually, with just one, for a test that does not make
sense, and happens only on postgres 8.3+, where a like comparison
is made against a date)

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

14

Hiya :slight_smile:

I am not releasing. Just tagging, building and testing atm. I won't make any major move until I have consulted Ben and Jody :smiley:

Victor Tey
Software Engineer
ASRDC
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Phone: +61 8 6436 8944
Victor.Tey@anonymised.com | www.csiro.au |
Address: Australian Resources Research Centre, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PLEASE NOTE
The information contained in this email may be confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aaime@anonymised.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 2:16 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

I am going to start the building and tagging process of Geoserver now

Sorry but... are all CITE tests passing? We don't do releases with CITE
test failures (actually, with just one, for a test that does not make
sense, and happens only on postgres 8.3+, where a like comparison
is made against a date)

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

15

Hi,

Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
provide some help?

Assertion: The Content-Type of all POST KVP-encoded request entities must be
'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'.

Request d1e4782_1:
   Method: post
   URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs
   Body:
service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=DescribeFeatureType&typename=sf:PrimitiveGeoFeature&namespace=xmlns(sf=http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf)
Error in call to extension function {public org.w3c.dom.NodeList
com.occamlab.te.TECore.request(org.w3c.dom.Document,java.lang.String) throws
java.lang.Throwable}: Exception in extension function java.lang.Exception:
Error invoking parser
{http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers\}XMLValidatingParser.XMLSchema
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The element type "xs:schema" must be
terminated by the matching end-tag "</xs:schema>".
Result: Failed

And the following are the result from doing a get request

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema&quot;
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml&quot;
xmlns:it.geosolutions="http://www.geo-solutions.it"
xmlns:sf="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf&quot;
elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf&quot;&gt;
  <xsd:import namespace="http://www.opengis.net/gml&quot;
schemaLocation="http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/gml/3.1.1/base/gml.xsd&quot;
/>
- <xsd:element name="PrimitiveGeoFeature" substitutionGroup="gml:_Feature"
type="sf:PrimitiveGeoFeatureType">
  <xsd:annotation />
  </xsd:element>
- <xsd:complexType name="PrimitiveGeoFeatureType">
- <xsd:complexContent>
- <xsd:extension base="gml:AbstractFeatureType">
- <xsd:sequence>
  <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="surfaceProperty"
type="gml:SurfacePropertyType" />
  <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="pointProperty"
type="gml:PointPropertyType" />
  <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="curveProperty"
type="gml:CurvePropertyType" />
  <xsd:element name="intProperty" type="xsd:integer" />
  <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="uriProperty" type="xsd:anyURI" />
  <xsd:element name="measurand" type="xsd:float" />
  <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="dateTimeProperty" type="xsd:dateTime" />
  <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="dateProperty" type="xsd:date" />
- <xsd:element name="decimalProperty">
- <xsd:simpleType>
- <xsd:restriction base="xsd:decimal">
  <xsd:totalDigits value="4" />
  <xsd:fractionDigits value="2" />
  </xsd:restriction>
  </xsd:simpleType>
  </xsd:element>
- <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="relatedFeature" type="gml:ReferenceType">
  <xsd:annotation />
  </xsd:element>
  </xsd:sequence>
  </xsd:extension>
  </xsd:complexContent>
  </xsd:complexType>
  </xsd:schema>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28580115.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

16

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

Hi,

Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
provide some help?

I'm doing the morning builds and then I can try to have a look at it.

Btw, if you need some prompt help the dev list is not the first place to
ask, IRC is definitely better. Fall back on IRC only if you don't get
a response or if you want to summarize what happened there...

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

17

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

Hi,

Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
provide some help?

Ah, btw, did you run the other test suites? Is this the only one giving
you trouble?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

18

The only one with issue is wfs1.1.0 and wcs-1.0 (cause I did not take out the wcs1_1.jar)

Concentrating one at the time. I manage to bring down the to 39 failures now from 51. I am a bit worried it might be cite1 and tests since I did not check those out from the repo and got it via email and they are at least 1 year old.

It would be great if someone would be able to check them out for me so that at least I can eliminate the possibility of me having an outdated copy

Victor Tey
Software Engineer
ASRDC
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Phone: +61 8 6436 8944
Victor.Tey@anonymised.com | www.csiro.au |
Address: Australian Resources Research Centre, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PLEASE NOTE
The information contained in this email may be confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aaime@anonymised.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 4:57 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

VT@anonymised.com ha scritto:

Hi,

Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
provide some help?

Ah, btw, did you run the other test suites? Is this the only one giving
you trouble?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

19

Victor.Tey@anonymised.com ha scritto:

The only one with issue is wfs1.1.0 and wcs-1.0 (cause I did not take out the wcs1_1.jar)

Cool. I'll try to reproduce the wfs 1.1.0 issues, in the meantime can you rerun cite wcs 1.0 with the wcs 1.1. service out of the way?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

20

Hi Andrea,

Thanks heaps :slight_smile:

I think the only outstanding issue with wfs1.1.0 now is the following. I will proceed with wcs then and come back to wfs1.1.0 :slight_smile:

The missing </xs:schema> was resolved when I rebuilt the CITE testing tool.

Request d1e27153_1:
   Method: GET
   URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&featureid=EntitéGénérique.fid--658fbe8d_128a4e8078b_-7fa7
   Response from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
      
   Messages from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
        Validation warning:
  SchemaLocation: schemaLocation value = 'http://www.opengis.net/wfs http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/wfs/1.1.0/wfs.xsd http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=DescribeFeatureType&typeName=sf%3AEntit�G�n�rique’ must have even number of URI's.
Validation error:
  cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid content was found starting with element 'sf:description'. One of '{"http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf&quot;:attribut\.Géométrie\}' is expected.
1 validation error and 1 warning detected.

Message d1e27182_1:
   FAILURE: Expected geometry value is gml:MultiSurface (feature gml:id="EntitéGénérique.fid--658fbe8d_128a4e8078b_-7fa7")

Result: Failed

Victor Tey
Software Engineer
ASRDC
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Phone: +61 8 6436 8944
Victor.Tey@anonymised.com | www.csiro.au |
Address: Australian Resources Research Centre, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PLEASE NOTE
The information contained in this email may be confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aaime@anonymised.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 5:06 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release

Victor.Tey@anonymised.com ha scritto:

The only one with issue is wfs1.1.0 and wcs-1.0 (cause I did not take out the wcs1_1.jar)

Cool. I'll try to reproduce the wfs 1.1.0 issues, in the meantime can
you rerun cite wcs 1.0 with the wcs 1.1. service out of the way?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.