Hi,
I’m wondering about how people feel about doing a GeoTools 2.7.0 final and a GeoServer RC2 release on Friday.
The list of issues tagged in Geotools for 2.7.0 is not very informative (we really need to do some jira gardening there),
but I’m not aware of any really problematic issue (like a regression that would really prevent a release).
I’m also open to make a GeoTools 2.7.0-RC2.
The list of issues tagged for GeoServer RC2 is:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GEOS+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%222.1-RC2%22+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+due+ASC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC
Out of these most are either bugs that have been there for ages (not regressions) or improvements, so they look like
something that could be delayed further into a 2.1.1 or something like that.
The only one that worries me is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4368, with two users reporting issues with
the integrated GWC going beserk and chewing all the server resources. However it seems none of the developers
managed to reproduce and it has a simple solution, remove all the GWC jars and keep on working.
So, opinions?
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
+1 on a release on Friday.
For geotools I am still trying to find time to get http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3324 in. But I may push it back to 2.7.1. But if it does get into this release it should not change any default behaviour (ie, you will need to set a flag to enable it).
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
I’m wondering about how people feel about doing a GeoTools 2.7.0 final and a GeoServer RC2 release on Friday.
The list of issues tagged in Geotools for 2.7.0 is not very informative (we really need to do some jira gardening there),
but I’m not aware of any really problematic issue (like a regression that would really prevent a release).
I’m also open to make a GeoTools 2.7.0-RC2.
The list of issues tagged for GeoServer RC2 is:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GEOS+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%222.1-RC2%22+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+due+ASC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC
Out of these most are either bugs that have been there for ages (not regressions) or improvements, so they look like
something that could be delayed further into a 2.1.1 or something like that.
The only one that worries me is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4368, with two users reporting issues with
the integrated GWC going beserk and chewing all the server resources. However it seems none of the developers
managed to reproduce and it has a simple solution, remove all the GWC jars and keep on working.
So, opinions?
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@anonymised.coms.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.