On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Torben Barsballe <
tbarsballe@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hello All,
This latest release has been fraught with peril (as is usual for RC1
releases). Now that it is complete, there are a few things I wanted to
bring up:
*Migration to build.geoserver.org <http://build.geoserver.org>*
Over the past few months, we have been gradually migrating to
build.geoserver.org as our new build server. As of now, I believe the
only remaining builds not fully migrated are the cite tests.
- When constructing the 2.12 jobs for the new stable branch, I have
only added them to build.geoserver.org. Unlike most of the other jobs
on there, I have set them up to notify the mailing lists if they fail. Now
that build.geoserver.org is more stable, we should consider swapping
other notifications from ares to build.geoserver.org.
Agreed
- When updating the GeoServer download page (geoserver.github.io), I
have updated all nightly builds to point to build.geoserver.org
instead of ares. Both new and historical builds seem to work.
Oooh, look at that, nice: https://build.geoserver.org/geoserver/ and
https://build.geoserver.org/geowebcache/
I was checking geotools too, it seems like the nightly builds for it are
not there yet: https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/
In any case, much appreciated 
- When updating the doc links on docs.geoserver.org, I attempted to
change the nightly builds to link to build.geoserver.org instead of
ares. I was unsuccessful, as build.geoserver.org only supports https,
and docs.geoserver.org only supports http. I have added a 2.12 nightly
doc build to ares for now. A long-term solution may involve migrating
docs.geoserver.org, perhaps to a github pages site.
Seems like a good suggestion
*SourceForge outage*
The SourceForge outage midweek caused a delay in the release, along with
other chaos, like temporarily knocking out the mailing lists.
- We should revisit using SourceForge to host artifacts. GitHub
supports attaching artifacts to releases; besides the time required to set
this up, does anyone know of any compelling reasons not to use this feature
for GeoTools, GeoWebCache and GeoServer releases? It seems fairly easy to
use.
Same worries I voiced earlier:
- We pump out a lot of releases, will github complain that we are using
too much space? Is there any way to check
- Should we transfer the full history, or just part?
I was also worried about world-wide download performance, but last I
checked at least from Italy downloading a large
binary from Github was fast.
I tried with the GeoTools 18-RC1 artifacts, available on github, it used
all of my (limited) bandwidth.
Maybe others want to try as well? Would be interesting to get some info
from Australia/New Zealand, Asia, Africa:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/releases/tag/18-RC1
*Windows and Mac build*
- The windows build on build.geoserver.org is now fully automatic, and
integrated with the regular release procedure.
Awesome
- The mac build still requires some manual steps from someone with
access to the Boundless desktop-ci jenkins build box.
I guess we know who to bother when doing releases then 
Cheers
Andrea
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.