[Geoserver-devel] GeoServer Configuration Draft

We made a few updates in response to the feedback we have gotten so far.
Thanks for all your feedback!

The only issue raised that we could not completely address is the
FeatureType XMLSchema fragments.
It would be nice to dynamically create the form based on XMLSchema
primitive types but we simply don't have time this week.

Cheers,
Jody Garnett

(attachments)

MemoryModel_GeoserverConfig.pdf (451 KB)

I work in an Geoserver Web based Config, you work in this also.

William Moreno
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jgarnett@anonymised.com>
To: <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer Configuration Draft

We made a few updates in response to the feedback we have gotten so far.
Thanks for all your feedback!

The only issue raised that we could not completely address is the
FeatureType XMLSchema fragments.
It would be nice to dynamically create the form based on XMLSchema
primitive types but we simply don't have time this week.

Cheers,
Jody Garnett

It seems like we should combine these efforts. What have you done so far?
Is it with 1.0.* or 1.1.*? Are you using STRUTS or something else? Are
you working off of cvs? Does the proposed memory model sound good to you?
Refractions has a few people working to implement it right now, putting a
struts based web config on top of it. Do you have any code of what you've
done so far? I would like to see geoserver efforts coordinated, so we do
not replicate work.

Chris

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Bladimir Moreno wrote:

I work in an Geoserver Web based Config, you work in this also.

William Moreno
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jgarnett@anonymised.com>
To: <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer Configuration Draft

> We made a few updates in response to the feedback we have gotten so far.
> Thanks for all your feedback!
>
> The only issue raised that we could not completely address is the
> FeatureType XMLSchema fragments.
> It would be nice to dynamically create the form based on XMLSchema
> primitive types but we simply don't have time this week.
>
> Cheers,
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--

Bladimir Moreno wrote:

I configure the old service structure for my grade project, but i don't lnow
how to make a insert feature type, and other things.

this is my work

William Moreno

Hmm. How did you go about working with the old config files?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jody Garnett" <jgarnett@anonymised.com>
To: "Bladimir Moreno" <bladiyo@anonymised.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer Configuration Draft

That is great!

We are starting work on a GeoServer 1.2 branch. Are you a committer? I
work at Refractions along with two other people, we will be making our
initial release next friday. We are trying to have things wrapped up
before Chris Holmes leaves at the end of the month.

What did you think of our proposal? And which part of the configuration
process are you working on?

Jody

Bladimir Moreno wrote:

I work in an Geoserver Web based Config, you work in this also.

William Moreno