Hi Bart,
cc'ing geoserver-devel.
Glad it worked, I've tracked it at <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1687>
Regarding the encoding declaration problem I'm not sure, does someone know if
its a known problem? Otherwise please add a jira issue for it.
cheers,
Gabriel
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 02:39:49 pm Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) wrote:
Hi Gabriel,
this works, it leaves out the column.
Now I also get the 1.0.0 response for DescribeFeatureType, but there is the
old problem with the encoding of the xml tag (encoding="UTF-8: Unicode
UTF-8" instead of encoding="UTF-8").<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8: Unicode UTF-8"?><xs:schema
targetNamespace="http://www.minvenw.nl/rws/agi"
xmlns:rwsagi="http://www.minvenw.nl/rws/agi"
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified" version="1.0"><xs:import
namespace="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
schemaLocation="http://145.50.148.45:8082/geoserver/schemas/gml/2.1.2.1/fea
ture.xsd"/><xs:complexType xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
name="DID.ANNOTATIE_Type"><xs:complexContent><xs:extension
base="gml:AbstractFeatureType"><xs:sequence><xs:element name="OBJECTID"
minOccurs="0" nillable="true" type="xs:int"/><xs:element name="DATUM"
minOccurs="0" nillable="true" type="xs:dateTime"/><xs:element
name="GEBRUIKER" minOccurs="0"
nillable="true"><xs:simpleType><xs:restriction
base="xs:string"><xs:maxLength
value="2147483647"/></xs:restriction></xs:simpleType></xs:element><xs:eleme
nt name="TITEL" minOccurs="0" nillable="true"><xs:simpleType><xs:restriction
base="xs:string"><xs:maxLength
value="2147483647"/></xs:restriction></xs:simpleType></xs:element><xs:eleme
nt name="SHAPE" minOccurs="0" nillable="true"
type="gml:MultiPolygonPropertyType"/></xs:sequence></xs:extension></xs:comp
lexContent></xs:complexType><xs:element name="DID.ANNOTATIE"
type="rwsagi:DID.ANNOTATIE_Type"
substitutionGroup="gml:_Feature"/></xs:schema>Best regards,
Bart--
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
http://www.osgis.nl--------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------
Van: Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com>
Naar: Bart van den Eijnden OSGIS <bartvde@anonymised.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [Geoserver-users] DescribeFeatureType problem
Datum: 23/01/08 10:06> Hey Bart,
> cool so.
> Please try out the attached jar.
> It _should_ avoid setting up a attribute types that can't be handled(blob,
> raster) into feature types.
> Note I don't have a way to test it right now, so you'll be my lab rabbit.
>
> Please let me know how it goes. It would be good if you set the geoserver
> logging level to GEOTOOLS_DEVELOPER profile so the log contains as much
> information as possible, and upon any error send me the geoserver log.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Gabriel
>
> On Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:05:22 pm Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)wrote:
> > Hi Gabriel,
> >
> > the attribute is nillable, and I don't need to put anything in it.It's
> > just that ArcSDE tells me not to remove this column otherwise I
> wouldhave
> > done that
> >
> > I would be willing to try a jar out ofcourse. TIA.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bart
> >
> > --
> > Bart van den Eijnden
> > OSGIS, Open Source GIS
> > http://www.osgis.nl
> >
> >
> > --------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------
> > Van: Gabriel Roldán <groldan@anonymised.com>
> > Naar: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > <geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Cc: Andrea Aime <aaime@anonymised.com>, Bart van den EijndenOSGIS
> > <bartvde@anonymised.com>, Saul Farber
> <Saul.Farber@anonymised.com> > Onderwerp: Re: [Geoserver-users]
> DescribeFeatureType problem > Datum: 23/01/08 08:53
> >
> > > Hi Bart, sorry for the late response
> > >
> > > the best I can think of to enable you using the table is to trya
> >
> > workaround
> >
> > > like ignoring this kind of columns in the geotools arcsde
> pluginas long
> >
> > as
> >
> > > they're nillable.
> > > I could try that and send you a jar to try out. You don't needto set a
> >
> > value
> >
> > > for that column through WFS-T, right? if so would ignoring thatcolumn
> >
> > would
> >
> > > be enough for your needs?
> > > Otherwise we should need to actually support blobs at arcsde(which is
> >
> > there
> >
> > > but never actually tried it), and which could be morecomplicated, on the
> >
> > WFS
> >
> > > side of the fence. That won't happen in the very near futurethough
> > > except
> > >
> > > through some funded work or code donation, due to other higherpriority
> > > concerns.
> > >
> > > Would you be willing to try out an arcsde jar with thatworkaround so?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Gabriel
> > > On Wednesday 23 January 2008 10:19:51 am Andrea Aime wrote:
> > > &gt; Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) ha scritto:
> > > &gt; &gt; Hi Andrea,
> > > &gt; &gt;
> > > &gt; &gt; the table is still empty, we are trying to
> useWFS-T to fill it
> >
> > but
> >
> > > &gt; &gt; without success right now. So I can't do aGetFeature as yet
> > > &gt; &gt;
> > > &gt; &gt; For reference:
> > > &gt; &gt;
> > > &gt; &gt;
> >
> >http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.techArticles.articleSh
> >
> > > &gt; &gt;ow&amp;d=21938
> > > &gt;
> > > &gt; Hum, not sure we could do anything good with this kindof
> > > &gt; column... maybe it would be wiser to hide it at the
datastore
> > > &gt; level? Doing WFS-T on it may be problematic thought,
> isArcSDE
> > > &gt; able to fill in a default value if we don't provide
one?
> > > &gt;
> > > &gt; ArcSDE gurus needed here.
> > > &gt; Cheers
> > > &gt; Andrea
> > > &gt;
> > > &gt;
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > &gt; This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > &gt; Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> > > &gt;
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >
> &gt; _______________________________________________ > >
> &gt; Geoserver-users mailing list
> > > &gt; Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > &gt;https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
> > > &gt;
> > > &gt;
> >
> >!DSPAM:4045,479743c931291096210785!