Hi all,
the WMS needs the FORMAT parameter in the GetFeatureInfo request, but
in the OGC specifics seems that this parameter should not be requested
in GetFeatureInfo.
Is it right? In this case the check on this parameter should be removed!!!
No, it's covered in the kvp <map_request_copy> in the GetFeatureInfo
request table (I'm on the 1.1.1 spec, top of page 40):
7.3.3.4 map_request_copy
<map request copy> is not a name/value pair like the other parameters.
Instead, most of the GetMap request parameters that generated the
original map are repeated. Two are omitted because GetFeatureInfo
provides its own values: VERSION and REQUEST. The remainder of the
GetMap request shall be embedded contiguously in the GetFeatureInfo
request.
You have to include all the original params of the GetMap request, and
format is one of them. I know, kinda silly, but I'm pretty sure that's
how it works. I'd be fine with not being super strict on the format,
but I'm not sure of our implementation - if we actually use the format
param on our request - like if it's used to generate the map.
C
Quoting Alessio Fabiani <alessio.fabiani@anonymised.com>:
Hi all,
the WMS needs the FORMAT parameter in the GetFeatureInfo request, but
in the OGC specifics seems that this parameter should not be
requested
in GetFeatureInfo.Is it right? In this case the check on this parameter should be
removed!!!-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
----------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/