[should have included dev list]
On 15/03/15 06:24, Andrea Aime wrote:
The gs-wps failures, do you have details? I'm travelling, doing a full build uses too much battery.
Andrea, even after reverting the GeoTools type name caching, I see these failures in gs-wps-core:
Failed tests: testAddOperation(org.geoserver.wps.gs.BinaryProcessingsTest): expected:<1978.0> but was:<11977.0>
testMultiplyOperation(org.geoserver.wps.gs.BinaryProcessingsTest): expected:<978121.0> but was:<-9.901188E7>
testStatisticsSfDem(org.geoserver.wps.gs.RasterZonalStatsTest): expected:<2.74314[4]E7> but was:<2.74314[7]E7>
These failures can be fixed by reverting this commit:
commit 21a6888afc6d55aeda88edd491601a88606a5e8e
Author: Alvaro Huarte <ahuarte47@anonymised.com>
Date: Tue Mar 3 17:24:45 2015 +0100
[GEOS-6906] Fix bad calculation of source Coverage Transform
I will try reverting all three (two GeoTools and this one GeoServer) and if I can get a clean build, I will push to the master branches.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
Transient Software <http://transient.nz>
New Zealand