Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last week, and decided to tackle GSIP 80.
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes needed, and the test changes:
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like to push this one to a vote.
Thanks!
-Justin
–http://opengeo.org
+1 of course
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last week, and decided to tackle GSIP 80.
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes needed, and the test changes:
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like to push this one to a vote.
Thanks!
-Justin
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Hi, I am not a member of the PSC but I would vote +1
2012/10/1 Alessio Fabiani <alessio.fabiani@anonymised.com68… >
+1 of course
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last week, and decided to tackle GSIP 80.
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes needed, and the test changes:
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like to push this one to a vote.
Thanks!
-Justin
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last week, and decided to tackle GSIP 80.
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes needed, and the test changes:
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like to push this one to a vote.
+1
Cheers
–
Ing. Andrea Aime@geowolf
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
+1
Ing. Simone Giannecchini@simogeo
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Andrea Aime
+39 0584 1660272
I have an additional idea how to speed up test times. Until now , for each setup a security migration is done. (Generating xml files, generating keys and a keystore, doing encryption,…).
If we could decide to use password digesting (not revertible) starting with fresh installations of Geoserver 2.3, we can save a lot of time bypassing migration code. For upgrading of existing installation , we can keep password encryption giving the admin the chance to revert to plain text passwords if needed.
Opinions ?
2012/10/1 Simone Giannecchini <simone.giannecchini@anonymised.com >
+1
Regards,
Ing. Simone Giannecchini@simogeo
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
fax: +39 0584 962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Andrea Aimeandrea.aime@anonymised.com > wrote:
+39 0584 1660272
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Hey Christian,
Actually the new system tests actually prevent the migration from occuring by copying out a precanned 2.2.x security configuration into the data directory. Perhaps there are more savings to be gained though, any thoughts are welcome.
-Justin
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christian Mueller <mcrmcr21@anonymised.com > wrote:
I have an additional idea how to speed up test times. Until now , for each setup a security migration is done. (Generating xml files, generating keys and a keystore, doing encryption,…).
If we could decide to use password digesting (not revertible) starting with fresh installations of Geoserver 2.3, we can save a lot of time bypassing migration code. For upgrading of existing installation , we can keep password encryption giving the admin the chance to revert to plain text passwords if needed.
Opinions ?
2012/10/1 Simone Giannecchini <simone.giannecchini@anonymised.com >
+1
Regards,
Ing. Simone Giannecchini@simogeo
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
fax: +39 0584 962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Andrea Aimeandrea.aime@anonymised.com > wrote:
+39 0584 1660272
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–http://opengeo.org
excellent, +1
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Alessio Fabiani
+1 of course
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80+-+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called "fasttest":
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like
Thanks!
-Justin
--http://opengeo.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--http://opengeo.org
Awesome work guys, definitely +1 here.
One small thing - it’d be good to update the proposal to reflect that junit4 was chosen. It now reads a bit too speculative, and it’d be good to have the full decision trial made in it, like a bit of why junit4 was chosen (sounds like the two were super comparable, so it could even be ‘we flipped a coin’, but I imagine there was a slight bit more intent than that).
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Gabriel Roldan <groldan@anonymised.com > wrote:
excellent, +1
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Alessio Fabianialessio.fabiani@anonymised.com > wrote:
+1 of course
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com >
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like
Thanks!
-Justin
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
+1 looks good
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential. If received in error please destroy and immediately notify us. Do not copy or disclose the contents.
jive
October 1, 2012, 10:18pm
11
+1
–
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 4:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last week, and decided to tackle GSIP 80.
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes needed, and the test changes:
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like to push this one to a vote.
Thanks!
-Justin
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
+1.
That looks great, Justin. I support the choice of JUnit 4 because I know it and not TestNG.
Thanks to everyone for their great effort in Vienna!
On 01/10/12 14:22, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80+-+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called "fasttest":
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would
Thanks!
-Justin
--http://opengeo.org
--
On 01/10/12 16:36, Christian Mueller wrote:
Hi, I am not a member of the PSC
Christian, you are still on the PSC list (and the PSC as far as I know):http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/psc.html
I do not recall you stepping down, nor the committee declaring your position vacant. Did I miss something in the minutes?
--
And when you update the wiki with the results of the vote, please update the PSC list on the GSIP template.
--
I think I am not allowed to edit
http://geoserver.org/pages/templates/viewpagetemplate.action?pageTemplateId=1114114&key=GEOS
2012/10/2 Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com >
And when you update the wiki with the results of the vote, please update
–Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com
Don’t let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APMhttp://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Holmes <cholmes@anonymised.com > wrote:
Awesome work guys, definitely +1 here.
One small thing - it’d be good to update the proposal to reflect that junit4 was chosen. It now reads a bit too speculative, and it’d be good to have the full decision trial made in it, like a bit of why junit4 was chosen (sounds like the two were super comparable, so it could even be ‘we flipped a coin’, but I imagine there was a slight bit more intent than that).
Right. Will do. To sum up though it actually turned out that JUnit4 had some of the features that made testng look really attractive, namely test groups. That coupled with the fact that the juni4 upgrade was a little less invasive (no new eclipse plugins, etc… needed) and that geotools is already using Junit4 it made most sense imo.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Gabriel Roldan <groldan@anonymised.com > wrote:
excellent, +1
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Alessio Fabianialessio.fabiani@anonymised.com > wrote:
+1 of course
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com >
Hi all,
As many of you know a few of us attended a code sprint in Vienna last
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+80±+Testing+Overhaul
I wrote up the results on the blog.
http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/09/30/vienna-code-sprint/
We worked on a branch called “fasttest”:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/fasttest
I have since cleaned it up a bit, separating some fo the core changes
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/fasttest_clean
So with that in case anyone has ay more items for discussion i would like
Thanks!
-Justin
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–http://opengeo.org
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Got visibility?http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y ?http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–http://opengeo.org
Hi all,
this is a call for vote for the GSIP 79:http://geoserver.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49938445
This is the main thread discussion:http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/GSIP-79-Json-support-and-WFS-and-WMS-ExceptionHandler-s-td4999973i20.html#a5003213
This is the pull request implementing requested changes for the master branch:https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/41/
You are kindly invited to vote.
+1
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Carlo Cancellieri <ccancellieri@anonymised.com > wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote for the GSIP 79:http://geoserver.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49938445
This is the main thread discussion:http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/GSIP-79-Json-support-and-WFS-and-WMS-ExceptionHandler-s-td4999973i20.html#a5003213
This is the pull request implementing requested changes for the master branch:https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/41/
You are kindly invited to vote.
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d
Geoserver-devel mailing listGeoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Carlo Cancellieri
Hi all,
this is a call for vote for the GSIP 79:http://geoserver.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49938445
This is the main thread discussion:http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/GSIP-79-Json-support-and-WFS-and-WMS-ExceptionHandler-s-td4999973i20.html#a5003213
This is the pull request implementing requested changes for the master branch:https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/41/
You are kindly invited to vote.
I already voted in the other thread with a +1
Cheers
Ing. Andrea Aime@geowolf
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
+0
Ing. Simone Giannecchini@simogeo
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Alessio Fabiani
+1
Ing. Alessio Fabiani@alfa7691
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Carlo Cancellieri
Hi all,
this is a call for vote for the GSIP 79:http://geoserver.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49938445
This is the main thread discussion:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/GSIP-79-Json-support-and-WFS-and-WMS-ExceptionHandler-s-td4999973i20.html#a5003213
This is the pull request implementing requested changes for the masterhttps://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/41/
You are kindly invited to vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
