As discussed some time ago, I would like to propose the imagemap community module to become an extension for GeoServer 1.7.x. Do I need to write a GSIP as written in GSIP-22?
Thanks,
Mauro Bartolomeoli
As discussed some time ago, I would like to propose the imagemap community module to become an extension for GeoServer 1.7.x. Do I need to write a GSIP as written in GSIP-22?
Thanks,
Mauro Bartolomeoli
Hi Mauro,
Yes, the process states that a GSIP is required. However I can't remember if some of us talked about relaxing that requirement in some cases. Andrea, can you remember?
However, the GSIP would be quite minimal. As for the other requirements I believe they are met. It meets the required test coverage last i checked, and there is a wiki page here:
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/HTML+ImageMap+support
And it has a maintainer (you ). So it should be good to go.
What do you think about timing Mauro. We are releasing 1.7.2 next week, do you think we could get it in time. Would be a nice addition to the release for sure. If not we can certainly put it on the road map for 1.7.3.
-Justin
Mauro Bartolomeoli wrote:
As discussed some time ago, I would like to propose the imagemap community module to become an extension for GeoServer 1.7.x. Do I need to write a GSIP as written in GSIP-22?
Thanks,
Mauro Bartolomeoli------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
What do you think about timing Mauro. We are releasing 1.7.2 next week, do you think we could get it in time. Would be a nice addition to the release for sure. If not we can certainly put it on the road map for 1.7.3.
For me the module is ok, but I don't think I have sufficient privileges on the repository to move it out of the community folder.
Mauro
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hi Mauro,
Yes, the process states that a GSIP is required. However I can't remember if some of us talked about relaxing that requirement in some cases. Andrea, can you remember?
Yes, we discussed a bit on IRC during a meeting and the consens
was, as far as I remember, that asking for GSIP was a bit excessive
since an extension is just a pluggable module (that is, it does not
touch core).
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
Ok cool, that is what I thought. So I think this case qualifies unless anyone objects. So as I see it the module can be moved as Mauro sees fit.
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hi Mauro,
Yes, the process states that a GSIP is required. However I can't remember if some of us talked about relaxing that requirement in some cases. Andrea, can you remember?
Yes, we discussed a bit on IRC during a meeting and the consens
was, as far as I remember, that asking for GSIP was a bit excessive
since an extension is just a pluggable module (that is, it does not
touch core).Cheers
Andrea
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
For me the module is ok, but I don't think I have sufficient privileges on the repository to move it out of the community folder.
You technically do as having commit access to community space gives you commit access anywhere... but i would be happy to perform the move. Just give me the go ahead that you don't have any changes outstanding and I will move it to extension.
-Justin
Mauro
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
For me the module is ok, but I don't think I have sufficient privileges on the repository to move it out of the community folder.
You technically do as having commit access to community space gives you commit access anywhere... but i would be happy to perform the move. Just give me the go ahead that you don't have any changes outstanding and I will move it to extension.
Sure, you can go.
Mauro
Hi Mauro,
So the imagemap module has been moved to extension. Congrats!!
However on trunk the extension does not seem to compile. The version of imagemap on trunk seems a bit out of date. Shall we sync it up with the version on 1.7.x?
-Justin
Mauro Bartolomeoli wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
For me the module is ok, but I don't think I have sufficient privileges on the repository to move it out of the community folder.
You technically do as having commit access to community space gives you commit access anywhere... but i would be happy to perform the move. Just give me the go ahead that you don't have any changes outstanding and I will move it to extension.
Sure, you can go.
Mauro
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi Mauro,
So the imagemap module has been moved to extension. Congrats!!
Thanks!
However on trunk the extension does not seem to compile. The version of imagemap on trunk seems a bit out of date. Shall we sync it up with the version on 1.7.x?
Sure, I'll do it early next week if you agree.
Mauro
Mauro Bartolomeoli wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi Mauro,
So the imagemap module has been moved to extension. Congrats!!
Thanks!
However on trunk the extension does not seem to compile. The version of imagemap on trunk seems a bit out of date. Shall we sync it up with the version on 1.7.x?
Sure, I'll do it early next week if you agree.
Sounds good, proceed as you please. I have disabled the extension on trunk for now.
Mauro
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.