Hi All,
Can anyone speak to the changes in structure for ImagePyramid Store? What it used to do for structure was to create an index shapefile for each level in the pyramid, and then structure a properties file as such:
#Automatically generated
#Wed May 11 21:12:14 EDT 2011
Name=aerial_1
Levels=0.5,0.5 1.0,1.0 2.0,2.0 4.0,4.0 8.0,8.0 16.0,16.0
LevelsNum=6
Envelope2D=2112500.0,584000.0 2145268.0,621696.0
LevelsDirs=0 1 2 3 4 5
What it appears to do now is to instead create a single shapefile, and leave the properties at the top level, something like this:
#-Automagically created from GeoTools-
#Mon Apr 02 20:53:23 EDT 2012
Levels=0.5,0.5
Heterogeneous=true
AbsolutePath=false
Name=aerial_2008
Caching=false
ExpandtoRGB=false
LocationAttribute=location
SuggestSPI=it.geosolutions.imageioimpl.plugins.tiff.TIFFImageReaderSpi
LevelsNum=1
Is this correct behavior? (bounce me back down to the users group if appropriate)
Best,
Thanks,
Steve
Apologies for abusing the list-- wrong store type. Confusing imagepyramids and imagemosaic. For those of you at FOSS4G NA next week, you may harass me in person.
Best,
Steve
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Stephen Mather <mather.stephen@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Can anyone speak to the changes in structure for ImagePyramid Store? What it used to do for structure was to create an index shapefile for each level in the pyramid, and then structure a properties file as such:
#Automatically generated
#Wed May 11 21:12:14 EDT 2011
Name=aerial_1
Levels=0.5,0.5 1.0,1.0 2.0,2.0 4.0,4.0 8.0,8.0 16.0,16.0
LevelsNum=6
Envelope2D=2112500.0,584000.0 2145268.0,621696.0
LevelsDirs=0 1 2 3 4 5
What it appears to do now is to instead create a single shapefile, and leave the properties at the top level, something like this:
#-Automagically created from GeoTools-
#Mon Apr 02 20:53:23 EDT 2012
Levels=0.5,0.5
Heterogeneous=true
AbsolutePath=false
Name=aerial_2008
Caching=false
ExpandtoRGB=false
LocationAttribute=location
SuggestSPI=it.geosolutions.imageioimpl.plugins.tiff.TIFFImageReaderSpi
LevelsNum=1
Is this correct behavior? (bounce me back down to the users group if appropriate)
Best,
Thanks,
Steve