Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past unmaintained at this point. I was thinking if we can jump straight to version 9? It looks like 9.3+ requires java 8 so I was going to see how it looked upgrading to the latest 9.2.
Which brings up the question of when the java 8 upgrade is going to happen? If I followed one of the previously threads correctly that is still planned for the 2.9 series?
-Justin
We are set to update to Java 8 if you want to go higher.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:57 PM Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past unmaintained at this point. I was thinking if we can jump straight to version 9? It looks like 9.3+ requires java 8 so I was going to see how it looked upgrading to the latest 9.2.
Which brings up the question of when the java 8 upgrade is going to happen? If I followed one of the previously threads correctly that is still planned for the 2.9 series?
-Justin
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
–
Jody Garnett
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
wrote:
Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel
about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past
unmaintained at this point. I was thinking if we can jump straight to
version 9? It looks like 9.3+ requires java 8 so I was going to see how it
looked upgrading to the latest 9.2.
Yep... the switch to Java 8 is currently blocked by the main repo failure,
the subsequent change to cloud based repo and
redirection issues, and I believe also by the planned switch of Ares onto a
cloud machine.
I believe Jukka was also looking into a jetty upgrade, there was a bit of
discussion, but don't know
if he started working on it, or not (it's been some time ago, haven't heard
back, so maybe not).
I've cc'ed him in this conversation.
Cheers
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
Ares has a java 8 VM in place, if we would like to change master over.
Right now we have two experiments in place:
Ares shows both have similar build times, can I ask what build times the developer list is seeing for these branches?
I want to make sure we are not blocked.
–
Jody Garnett
On 24 October 2015 at 22:59, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com.403…> wrote:
Since it seems like now is a good time for upgrades how do people feel about a jetty upgrade? The 6.x version we are using is far past unmaintained at this point. I was thinking if we can jump straight to version 9? It looks like 9.3+ requires java 8 so I was going to see how it looked upgrading to the latest 9.2.
Yep… the switch to Java 8 is currently blocked by the main repo failure, the subsequent change to cloud based repo and
redirection issues, and I believe also by the planned switch of Ares onto a cloud machine.
I believe Jukka was also looking into a jetty upgrade, there was a bit of discussion, but don’t know
if he started working on it, or not (it’s been some time ago, haven’t heard back, so maybe not).
I’ve cc’ed him in this conversation.
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy’s New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.