So.. as wfsv leaves shall we move gwc in :).
Originally i wanted it to be an extension module but I have been since been convinced it should be a core module.
And technically it meets all the requirements:
* has users
* maintainer (arne)
* test coverage (no code to test...)
* no ip violations
* wiki page (http://geoserver.org/display/GEOSDOC/GeoWebCache)
* stable (pretty close to 1.0...)
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
I am happy either way; I still have not got a good answer on the relationship between GWC and ... GetCapabilities Vendor Capabilities section; and GetMap behavior for tiled=true
Jody
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
So.. as wfsv leaves shall we move gwc in :).
Originally i wanted it to be an extension module but I have been since been convinced it should be a core module.
And technically it meets all the requirements:
* has users
* maintainer (arne)
* test coverage (no code to test...)
* no ip violations
* wiki page (http://geoserver.org/display/GEOSDOC/GeoWebCache)
* stable (pretty close to 1.0...)
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
I am happy either way; I still have not got a good answer on the relationship between GWC and ... GetCapabilities Vendor Capabilities section; and GetMap behavior for tiled=true
The only real answer as of now, is that there is no relationship,
the code that handles tiled=true was created way before GWC was
conceived.
If you want to have a different/sensible one, patches are most
welcomed 
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
Andrea Aime wrote:
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
I am happy either way; I still have not got a good answer on the relationship between GWC and ... GetCapabilities Vendor Capabilities section; and GetMap behavior for tiled=true
The only real answer as of now, is that there is no relationship,
the code that handles tiled=true was created way before GWC was
conceived.
If you want to have a different/sensible one, patches are most
welcomed
I was thinking that we would need an extension point (to intercept and handle WMS GetMap requests with tiled=true and route them to the appropriate code). If the work is being folded in perhaps this will be easier.
Is GWC no longer interested in operating as a standalone war?
Jody
Jody Garnett wrote:
I was thinking that we would need an extension point (to intercept and handle WMS GetMap requests with tiled=true and route them to the appropriate code). If the work is being folded in perhaps this will be easier.
Is GWC no longer interested in operating as a standalone war?
The standalone version will continue. As you know, it's used by people who don't use GeoServer at all.
I'm waiting for a little feedback regarding usage of the new catalog, will share a plan for the integrated version tomorrow or Monday.
I'll also try to review the getcapabilities discussion we had in October, I don't recall the conclusion or how much work (GSIPs?) was needed. Ideally, I think you would want to allow modules to contribute sections (provided the right flags are present in the request), not reroute the entire request.
-Arne
--
Arne Kepp
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers