I am studying the response time of mapbuilder and openlayer which are integrated into
geoserver: much speak that openlayer is faster, but my comparison showed the opposite is what you have of the
ideas on the manners of possible optimization from posting point of view?
I would like to ask to you whether new service WCS of géoserver
optimizes the response time because we work with version 1.3; if not
which are the possibilities, the possible solutions of optimization on
géoserver (configuration, services.)?
In connection with do the version of mapbuilder, me I use version
1.0.1 and I would like to ask you which is the stable version which
integrates openlayer? If open to bush-hammer is integrated in
mapbuilder is what the response time will be decreased?
–
Cordialement
Ilyes JRAD
Mannouba Tunisie
tel 97 202 226
ilyes jrad ha scritto:
> I am studying the response time of mapbuilder and openlayer which are integrated into
> geoserver: much speak that openlayer is faster, but my comparison showed the opposite is what you have of the
> ideas on the manners of possible optimization from posting point of view?
> I would like to ask to you whether new service WCS of géoserver
> optimizes the response time because we work with version 1.3; if not
> which are the possibilities, the possible solutions of optimization on
> géoserver (configuration, services.)?
GeoServer 1.3 is archaeology today, try out 1.5.2 and the "Geoserver
in production" guide on the GeoServer documentation, you should get
a speedup.
Anyways, the different response time is related to different trade offs.
OpenLayers takes more time to load the initial view, but it's
faster if you pan without changing the zoom level.
If you zoom a lot, non tiled approach is better, if you pan a lot,
tiled is better. Grab 1.5.2, the preview has links allowing you to
switch between tiled and non tiled and see the difference.
Oh, and if you are serving static maps (maps whose content does
not change over time), consider using TileCache:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDOC/TileCache+Tutorial
> In connection with do the version of mapbuilder, me I use version
> 1.0.1 and I would like to ask you which is the stable version which
> integrates openlayer? If open to bush-hammer is integrated in
> mapbuilder is what the response time will be decreased?
bush-hammer? What do you mean? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_hammer)
Anyways, the version of MapBuilder that integrates OL is yet
to be released, and no, it's not related to any speed consideration
beyond the tradeoff I was speaking about above.
Cheers
Andrea
I work with geoserver1.3.1, can i apply methods of Caching: OSCache,
TileCache, Squid?
dalloul wrote:
I am studying the response time of mapbuilder and openlayer which are
integrated into
geoserver: much speak that openlayer is faster, but my comparison showed
the
opposite is what you have of the
ideas on the manners of possible optimization from posting point of view?
I would like to ask to you whether new service WCS of géoserver
optimizes the response time because we work with version 1.3; if not
which are the possibilities, the possible solutions of optimization on
géoserver (configuration, services.)?
In connection with do the version of mapbuilder, me I use version
1.0.1 and I would like to ask you which is the stable version which
integrates openlayer? If open to bush-hammer is integrated in
mapbuilder is what the response time will be decreased?
--
Cordialement
Ilyes JRAD
Mannouba Tunisie
tel 97 202 226
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/optimisation-geoserver-tf4246954.html#a12139496
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
dalloul ha scritto:
I work with geoserver1.3.1, can i apply methods of Caching: OSCache,
TileCache, Squid?
TileCache should work with any GeoServer release, since it just
requires a WMS interface. We have a tutorial showing how you
can integrate the two:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDOC/TileCache+Tutorial
Cheers
Andrea