This is just a friendly minder about moving Geoserver forward in the
OSGeo incubation process. Last time I mentioned this, I know you guys
were working hard on a new release. Please let me know if there is
anything I can do to help Geoserver along with the process. I've been
watching all the traffic on this mailing list, and it is a pleasure to
see all the activity around this project.
Keep up the good work.
Landon
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
This is just a friendly minder about moving Geoserver forward in the
OSGeo incubation process. Last time I mentioned this, I know you guys
were working hard on a new release. Please let me know if there is
anything I can do to help Geoserver along with the process. I’ve been
watching all the traffic on this mailing list, and it is a pleasure to
see all the activity around this project.
Hi Landon,
I believe Jody did a first pass checking the requirements to complete incubation
and as far as I remember the thing we still need to do is a provenance review/
copyright check on the codebase.
Landon, do you know if there is anything else we have to work on?
Jody, mind to chime in? 
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
That is all we have left Notes are on the wiki.
I don’t even think we have any difficult “where did this sample data come from?” questions.
But we won’t know until we look - and then there will be something to help us with.
–
Jody Garnett
On 10/11/2012, at 3:43 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
This is just a friendly minder about moving Geoserver forward in the
OSGeo incubation process. Last time I mentioned this, I know you guys
were working hard on a new release. Please let me know if there is
anything I can do to help Geoserver along with the process. I’ve been
watching all the traffic on this mailing list, and it is a pleasure to
see all the activity around this project.Hi Landon,
I believe Jody did a first pass checking the requirements to complete incubation
and as far as I remember the thing we still need to do is a provenance review/
copyright check on the codebase.Landon, do you know if there is anything else we have to work on?
Jody, mind to chime in?
Cheers
Andrea–
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Ok. I'm just trying to give friendly nudges. I know everyone is busy.
Thanks.
Landon
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:
That is all we have left
I don't even think we have any difficult "where did this sample data come
from?" questions.But we won't know until we look - and then there will be something to help
us with.--
Jody GarnettOn 10/11/2012, at 3:43 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com>
wrote:This is just a friendly minder about moving Geoserver forward in the
OSGeo incubation process. Last time I mentioned this, I know you guys
were working hard on a new release. Please let me know if there is
anything I can do to help Geoserver along with the process. I've been
watching all the traffic on this mailing list, and it is a pleasure to
see all the activity around this project.Hi Landon,
I believe Jody did a first pass checking the requirements to complete
incubation
and as far as I remember the thing we still need to do is a provenance
review/
copyright check on the codebase.Landon, do you know if there is anything else we have to work on?
Jody, mind to chime in?
Cheers
Andrea--
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
Ok. I’m just trying to give friendly nudges. I know everyone is busy.
See the last meeting minutes sent a few minutes ago on this ml, it seems provenance review
is almost complete.
Afaik that was the last item we were missing?
Landon, do you know if there is anything else we should look at?
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
Andrea:
Let me check. I'm still a bit new with the OSGeo incubation process,
so give me a day or two to figure out. I'll get back to the list.
Landon
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com>
wrote:Ok. I'm just trying to give friendly nudges. I know everyone is busy.
See the last meeting minutes sent a few minutes ago on this ml, it seems
provenance review
is almost complete.
Afaik that was the last item we were missing?Landon, do you know if there is anything else we should look at?
Cheers
Andrea--
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it-------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
Andrea:
Let me check. I’m still a bit new with the OSGeo incubation process,
so give me a day or two to figure out. I’ll get back to the list.
Cool, thanks for checking. No rush
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
Darn, keeping the ml in the loop for good this time.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
Keeping the ml in the loop
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
OK. I did a litle poking around on the OSGeo Incubation web site.
According to this web page
(http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/codereview.html) if the code
review is complete by the GeoServer Team then I need to look over two
documents. The first is the document that captured the result of the
Library/Component Review. The second is the document that captured the
result of the Code Copyright Review. Have those documents been
assembled? If not, can they be created from the data at this page?:
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Provenance+ReviewI think I should be able to provide the incubation committee with
links to those documents when they are complete and I have reviewed
them.After reviewing the meeting minutes, Provenance Review Page, and
incubation documents from OSGeo, I’m not sure if we have addressed
these items:
- Selection of Geoserver documentation license.
- Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with GeoServer.
- Code contribution procedure.
It was my understanding that we just had to point out the shortcomings, not to
fix them right away.2 and 3 we should be able to fix quickly I believe, 1) will require a GSIP process
Cheers
Andrea
–
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
Geoserver Team:
I just want to follow-up on my e-mail from a few weeks ago. Based upon
my last review, we only had these three (3) outstanding items for
Geoserver incubation:
1) Selection of Geoserver documentation license.
2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with GeoServer.
3) Code contribution procedure.
Have any of these issues been fixed or resolved? Has the project
decided not to address any of them?
I'd like to provide the incubation committee with an update, and then
find out what remains to get you guys graduated.
Thanks for the help and your patience with the incubation process.
Landon
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Landon Blake
<sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
OK. I did a litle poking around on the OSGeo Incubation web site.
According to this web page
(http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/codereview.html) if the code
review is complete by the GeoServer Team then I need to look over two
documents. The first is the document that captured the result of the
Library/Component Review. The second is the document that captured the
result of the Code Copyright Review. Have those documents been
assembled? If not, can they be created from the data at this page?:
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Provenance+ReviewI think I should be able to provide the incubation committee with
links to those documents when they are complete and I have reviewed
them.After reviewing the meeting minutes, Provenance Review Page, and
incubation documents from OSGeo, I'm not sure if we have addressed
these items:1) Selection of Geoserver documentation license.
2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with GeoServer.
3) Code contribution procedure.Please forgive me if these things have already been addressed and I
have missed it.Landon
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Landon Blake
<sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:Andrea:
Let me check. I'm still a bit new with the OSGeo incubation process,
so give me a day or two to figure out. I'll get back to the list.Landon
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com>
wrote:Ok. I'm just trying to give friendly nudges. I know everyone is busy.
See the last meeting minutes sent a few minutes ago on this ml, it seems
provenance review
is almost complete.
Afaik that was the last item we were missing?Landon, do you know if there is anything else we should look at?
Cheers
Andrea--
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it-------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor@anonymised.com> wrote:
Geoserver Team:
I just want to follow-up on my e-mail from a few weeks ago. Based upon
my last review, we only had these three (3) outstanding items for
Geoserver incubation:
- Selection of Geoserver documentation license.
It was not clear to me that we had to choose a license. It was a suggestion from
the code sprint team that did the checks, but Jody told us it is sufficient to locate
any potential issue, not to fix it. Jody and Landon, please clarify and give us a
definitive direction?
Regardless, this one requires a GSIP, so it cannot be addressed until we have again
all hands on deck, say January 7th?
- Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with GeoServer.
Done for the most part, the only one data that we don’t have confirmation about is
States, asked around, while people believe it’s Census data we have no direct
confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back when you
were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory?
Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I remember
States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when GeoTools
itself graduated… which is here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt
It says the origin of that “statepop” dataset is unknown… a possible hint that vetting is all that
is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment?
- Code contribution procedure.
This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can’t remember about it off the top of my head.
We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found that is not ok in them?
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/docguide/contributing.html
http://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.x/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html
http://geoserver.org/download/attachments/819262/assignment_agreement.pdf?version=1
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
Andrea:
Let me respond to all of your comments.
You wrote: "It was not clear to me that we _had_ to choose a license.
It was a suggestion from
the code sprint team that did the checks, but Jody told us it is
sufficient to locate
any potential issue, not to fix it. Jody and Landon, please clarify
and give us a
definitive direction?"
I'm not sure if this is required. I don't think it is, but I will
double check with the incubation committee. If it is not required,
then I'll I need to know is that you guys don't want to hassle with it
at this point in time.
Having said that, I think anytime you can clear up licensing issues,
its a good thing. :]
You wrote: "Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't
have confirmation about is
States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no direct
confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back when you
were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory?
Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I remember
States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when GeoTools
itself graduated.... which is here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt
It says the origin of that "statepop" dataset is unknown... a possible
hint that vetting is all that
is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment?"
So GeoTools shares the same datasets? If that is the case, this
shouldn't be a big deal. Let me know. If the datasets aren't shared by
GeoTools, we may just need to note that the source and licensing of
the sample data is unknown.
Is the sample data deeply integrated into project documentaiton and
tutorials, and therefore hard to replace?
You wrote: "This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can't
remember about it off the top of my head.
We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was
found that is not ok in them?"
Code contribution procedures was just one of the items on my
checklist. I think the Incubation Committee just wants to know that
some procedures are in place. I'll review the links and then document
(somewhere) that the project has completed that item of the incubation
checklist.
I appreciate your patience as I try to tie up these loose ends. I'm
learning the incubation process with you.
Landon
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
It was not clear to me that we _had_ to choose a license. It was a
suggestion from
the code sprint team that did the checks, but Jody told us it is sufficient
to locate
any potential issue, not to fix it. Jody and Landon, please clarify and give
us a
definitive direction?Regardless, this one requires a GSIP, so it cannot be addressed until we
have again
all hands on deck, say January 7th?
2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with
GeoServer.
Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't have confirmation
about is
States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no
direct
confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back
when you
were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory?Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I
remember
States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when
GeoTools
itself graduated.... which is here:https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt
Yeah, I just lifted it from GeoTools, no more precise memory than that. Oh,
except that I'm pretty sure James Macgill was the one to add it. At the
very least I'm quite sure he created the infamous sld for it, so likely
added the data too. I think at some point I did subset the fields of the
state pop layer, to make it less big. It had to have been from US Census.
But I didn't actually download it, so don't know for sure. But yeah, if
things are transitive from GeoTools we should be fine - if it's not the
exact same data layer then it's a subset of the data that I did.
C
It says the origin of that "statepop" dataset is unknown... a possible
hint that vetting is all that
is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment?3) Code contribution procedure.
This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can't remember about it
off the top of my head.
We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found
that is not ok in them?
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/docguide/contributing.htmlhttp://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.x/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html
http://geoserver.org/download/attachments/819262/assignment_agreement.pdf?version=1
Cheers
Andrea--
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it-------------------------------------------------------
I think I was responsible for it and it came from the US Census. James was responsible for the SLD though
Ian
On 29 December 2012 00:21, Chris Holmes <cholmes@anonymised.com> wrote:
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only – learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
Ian Turton
- Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with GeoServer.
Done for the most part, the only one data that we don’t have confirmation about is
States, asked around, while people believe it’s Census data we have no direct
confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back when you
were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory?Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I remember
States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when GeoTools
itself graduated… which is here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt
Yeah, I just lifted it from GeoTools, no more precise memory than that. Oh, except that I’m pretty sure James Macgill was the one to add it. At the very least I’m quite sure he created the infamous sld for it, so likely added the data too. I think at some point I did subset the fields of the state pop layer, to make it less big. It had to have been from US Census. But I didn’t actually download it, so don’t know for sure. But yeah, if things are transitive from GeoTools we should be fine - if it’s not the exact same data layer then it’s a subset of the data that I did.
C
It says the origin of that “statepop” dataset is unknown… a possible hint that vetting is all that
is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment?
- Code contribution procedure.
This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can’t remember about it off the top of my head.
We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found that is not ok in them?
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/docguide/contributing.html
http://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.x/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html
http://geoserver.org/download/attachments/819262/assignment_agreement.pdf?version=1Cheers
Andrea
–
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
I started keeping a list of Mentor notes on Geoserver Incubation here:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoserver_Mentor_Notes
Landon
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Ian Turton <ijturton@anonymised.com> wrote:
I think I was responsible for it and it came from the US Census. James was
responsible for the SLD thoughIan
On 29 December 2012 00:21, Chris Holmes <cholmes@anonymised.com> wrote:
2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with
GeoServer.Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't have confirmation
about is
States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no
direct
confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back
when you
were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory?Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I
remember
States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when
GeoTools
itself graduated.... which is here:https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt
Yeah, I just lifted it from GeoTools, no more precise memory than that.
Oh, except that I'm pretty sure James Macgill was the one to add it. At the
very least I'm quite sure he created the infamous sld for it, so likely
added the data too. I think at some point I did subset the fields of the
state pop layer, to make it less big. It had to have been from US Census.
But I didn't actually download it, so don't know for sure. But yeah, if
things are transitive from GeoTools we should be fine - if it's not the
exact same data layer then it's a subset of the data that I did.C
It says the origin of that "statepop" dataset is unknown... a possible
hint that vetting is all that
is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment?3) Code contribution procedure.
This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can't remember about it
off the top of my head.
We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found
that is not ok in them?
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/docguide/contributing.htmlhttp://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.x/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html
http://geoserver.org/download/attachments/819262/assignment_agreement.pdf?version=1
Cheers
Andrea--
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel--
Ian Turton------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel