Hi all,
I notice that some of the poms are messy ( most likley due to myself
) with regard to indenting.
Would anyone mind if I formatted them?
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
Hi all,
I notice that some of the poms are messy ( most likley due to myself
) with regard to indenting.
Would anyone mind if I formatted them?
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hi all,
I notice that some of the poms are messy ( most likley due to myself
) with regard to indenting.Would anyone mind if I formatted them?
I was thinking more or less the same. No, I don't mind if you
format them, but we're more or less in the same situation as
java sources.
Since pom files are way less, maybe establishing a convention
would be enough.
What about same as java files, that is, 4 spaces indented?
Theoretically it would be possible to build a formatter
using SAX parser (Gabriel told me it's possible to parse
comments too with that) but I don't know if we have time for this.
Cheers
Andrea
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hi all,
I notice that some of the poms are messy ( most likley due to myself
) with regard to indenting.Would anyone mind if I formatted them?
I was thinking more or less the same. No, I don't mind if you
format them, but we're more or less in the same situation as
java sources.
Since pom files are way less, maybe establishing a convention
would be enough.
What about same as java files, that is, 4 spaces indented?
Works for me.
Theoretically it would be possible to build a formatter
using SAX parser (Gabriel told me it's possible to parse
comments too with that) but I don't know if we have time for this.
I found a utility called xmlformat which should do the trick nicely.
http://www.kitebird.com/software/xmlformat/
Cheers
Andrea!DSPAM:1004,45d9e0c5283821804284693!
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hum, implemented in either perl or ruby... not something
we can put inside the build either... thought it seems
to have more options than Eclipse.
Cheers
Andrea
Yeah, i was more thinking it would be something that we just run every
now and again, since poms dont get modified all that often it might not
be necessary to have it included in the build.
-Justin
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Hum, implemented in either perl or ruby... not something
we can put inside the build either... thought it seems
to have more options than Eclipse.
Cheers
Andrea-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel!DSPAM:1004,45d9e39b286861460912952!
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org