[Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Hi,

Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is correct for me?

I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always present.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415

I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on my own profile or something like that not the real repo).

I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.

Thanks in advance,

Paul

Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 that should be fine.

Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java

Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.

···


Jody Garnett

Hi Jody,

Thank you for this I will have a look again and see if I can work out how to build a local copy to test…unfortunately that is the bit that I’ve been struggling with on a Windows machine and with my level of Java experience.

As a quick side note I should say that when I used the proxy base URL I was using ${X-Forwarded-Host} as we access the server via a number of domains. It may be this that cased the port to still be present but I will investigate further.

Thanks,

Paul

···

Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 that should be fine.

Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java

Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.

Jody Garnett

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 07:49, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@…5627…> wrote:

Hi,

Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is correct for me?

I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always present.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415

I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on my own profile or something like that not the real repo).

I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.

Thanks in advance,

Paul

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

As an alternative to a debugger adding log statements into the code can also help.

···


Jody Garnett

I coincidentally already have a commit that does just this (I wanted this for CSW, but it is the same thing):

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3713

···

On 09/08/2019 20:32, Jody Garnett wrote:

As an alternative to a debugger adding log statements into the code can also help.


Jody Garnett

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 01:59, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Jody,

Thank you for this I will have a look again and see if I can work out how to build a local copy to test…unfortunately that is the bit that I’ve been struggling with on a Windows machine and with my level of Java experience.

As a quick side note I should say that when I used the proxy base URL I was using ${X-Forwarded-Host} as we access the server via a number of domains. It may be this that cased the port to still be present but I will investigate further.

Thanks,

Paul

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Sent: 06 August 2019 00:06
To: Paul Wittle <P.Wittle@anonymised.com>
Cc: Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 that should be fine.

Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java

Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.

Jody Garnett

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 07:49, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi,

Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is correct for me?

I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always present.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415

I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on my own profile or something like that not the real repo).

I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.

Thanks in advance,

Paul

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
[https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel)

Hi,

I’ve just got back into the office and this looks great; thanks for doing it.

Paul

···

From: Niels Charlier <niels@…2918…>
Sent: 16 August 2019 12:10
To: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

I coincidentally already have a commit that does just this (I wanted this for CSW, but it is the same thing):

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3713

On 09/08/2019 20:32, Jody Garnett wrote:

As an alternative to a debugger adding log statements into the code can also help.

Jody Garnett

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 01:59, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@…5627…> wrote:

Hi Jody,

Thank you for this I will have a look again and see if I can work out how to build a local copy to test…unfortunately that is the bit that I’ve been struggling with on a Windows machine and with my level of Java experience.

As a quick side note I should say that when I used the proxy base URL I was using ${X-Forwarded-Host} as we access the server via a number of domains. It may be this that cased the port to still be present but I will investigate further.

Thanks,

Paul

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@…403…>
Sent: 06 August 2019 00:06
To: Paul Wittle <P.Wittle@…4807…>
Cc: Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 that should be fine.

Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java

Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.

Jody Garnett

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 07:49, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@…5627…> wrote:

Hi,

Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is correct for me?

I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always present.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415

I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on my own profile or something like that not the real repo).

I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.

Thanks in advance,

Paul

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
[https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel)

HI Paul,

Out of curiosity, I tested version 2.15.3 locally, and you’re right, the backport didn’t work.

What is missing is this commit: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commit/5e354faeddc8a42a992aa3f15adc589da9625da5#diff-92d3f980cce070ba9b6fe6b76e2f8fd6

Kind Regards

Niels

···

On 01/10/2019 10:49, Paul Wittle wrote:

On 30/09/2019 12:00, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

So if you take your statement from https://ontwikkel.dov.vlaanderen.be/geoserver/ows?service=wms&version=1.3.0&request=GetCapabilities and compare with ours from https://wms.test.geowessex.com/ows?service=wms&version=1.3.0&request=GetCapabilities I think you should quickly spot the :443’s.

You can see the version we are running at https://wms.test.geowessex.com/web

I’ve no idea why it didn’t work but I guess I’d better investigate some sort of caching issue. We use Windows via all sorts of enterprise ICT applications so many something is just returning an old cached copy but other than that I’ve no idea why it is not working. As you say; it looks fine you your one.

Oh well, thanks again for the fix; I’m sure I’ll let mine to work at some point.

Cheers,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 30 September 2019 10:53
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

yes it works for us

not sure what you mean with “do I need to set a proxy base URL”, the whole idea is that the host name is taken from the request.

I have no idea what could be the explanation. where is it showing port numbers? which protocol and port? you have an example? compare with https://ontwikkel.dov.vlaanderen.be/geoserver/web/

Regards

Niels

On 30/09/2019 10:04, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

I’ve just installed version 2.15.3 on our dev and test sites and double checked that your pull request is included in the relevant branch source code; which it is.

My GetCapabilities documents still seem to contain the port numbers, is it working for you / do I need to set a proxy base URL for the change to take effect?

Thanks,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 06 September 2019 08:07
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

No worries, I’m always glad if my work is useful to other people!

On 06/09/2019 08:54, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi Niels,

Thank you so much for doing that for me and for putting in the fix. I know it was done as part of something else but it may be a huge help to me anyway.

Cheers,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 05 September 2019 15:30
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

You can do it with flags now indeed, but I just made a new PR using git

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3735

So it’s merged on the 2.15 branch now

Regards

Niels

On 03/09/2019 09:39, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

I don’t think I’m on the approved committers list as I haven’t really been able to get my head around everything yet. I mostly work on Windows machines using Microsoft based languages like visual basic so I want to learn more about Java/Linux/GIT before I start committing to the main repositories really.

If you are able to backport it that would be great but if you’d like me to try I can have a go; is it just a case of issuing a new pull request and then adding the two labels / flags?

Thanks,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 29 August 2019 13:33
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

I only committed it to master but we can backport it if you want. Are you able to do that?

Regards

Niels

On 28/08/2019 09:43, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

This is a silly question as I should know this by now but is your pull request now included in the latest nightly builds and has it been backported to the maintenance version or is it only on the newest versions?

Thanks,

Paul

From: Paul Wittle paul.wittle@anonymised.com
Sent: 27 August 2019 09:56
To: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com; geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Hi,

I’ve just got back into the office and this looks great; thanks for doing it.

Paul

From: Niels Charlier <niels@anonymised.com>
Sent: 16 August 2019 12:10
To: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

I coincidentally already have a commit that does just this (I wanted this for CSW, but it is the same thing):

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3713

On 09/08/2019 20:32, Jody Garnett wrote:

As an alternative to a debugger adding log statements into the code can also help.

Jody Garnett

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 01:59, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Jody,

Thank you for this I will have a look again and see if I can work out how to build a local copy to test…unfortunately that is the bit that I’ve been struggling with on a Windows machine and with my level of Java experience.

As a quick side note I should say that when I used the proxy base URL I was using ${X-Forwarded-Host} as we access the server via a number of domains. It may be this that cased the port to still be present but I will investigate further.

Thanks,

Paul

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Sent: 06 August 2019 00:06
To: Paul Wittle <P.Wittle@anonymised.com>
Cc: Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 that should be fine.

Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java

Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.

Jody Garnett

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 07:49, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi,

Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is correct for me?

I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always present.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415

I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on my own profile or something like that not the real repo).

I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.

Thanks in advance,

Paul

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
[https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel)

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

Hum… really? Weird, that change was part of the “remove deprecated calls” lot, was not meant as a fix, just a replacement of
deprecated methods calls with non deprecated ones.

If anyone has time, a backport PR would be useful

Cheers
Andrea

···

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.

Oh ok, got it now, you need that commit for your backport to work. Feel free to include it in the backport if you intend to make one

Cheers
Andrea

···

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.

I already backported the fix, and it was included in 2.15.3, but it isn’t doing anything yet. Which is unfortunate for Paul.

I created a backport PR for this commit alone, so that at least it will work in 2.15.4

Regards

Niels

···

On 07/10/2019 09:47, Andrea Aime wrote:

Oh ok, got it now, you need that commit for your backport to work. Feel free to include it in the backport if you intend to make one

Cheers
Andrea

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:44 AM Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hum… really? Weird, that change was part of the “remove deprecated calls” lot, was not meant as a fix, just a replacement of
deprecated methods calls with non deprecated ones.

If anyone has time, a backport PR would be useful

Cheers
Andrea

On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 6:48 PM Niels Charlier <niels@anonymised.com> wrote:

HI Paul,

Out of curiosity, I tested version 2.15.3 locally, and you’re right, the backport didn’t work.

What is missing is this commit: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commit/5e354faeddc8a42a992aa3f15adc589da9625da5#diff-92d3f980cce070ba9b6fe6b76e2f8fd6

Kind Regards

Niels

On 01/10/2019 10:49, Paul Wittle wrote:

On 30/09/2019 12:00, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

So if you take your statement from https://ontwikkel.dov.vlaanderen.be/geoserver/ows?service=wms&version=1.3.0&request=GetCapabilities and compare with ours from https://wms.test.geowessex.com/ows?service=wms&version=1.3.0&request=GetCapabilities I think you should quickly spot the :443’s.

You can see the version we are running at https://wms.test.geowessex.com/web

I’ve no idea why it didn’t work but I guess I’d better investigate some sort of caching issue. We use Windows via all sorts of enterprise ICT applications so many something is just returning an old cached copy but other than that I’ve no idea why it is not working. As you say; it looks fine you your one.

Oh well, thanks again for the fix; I’m sure I’ll let mine to work at some point.

Cheers,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 30 September 2019 10:53
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

yes it works for us

not sure what you mean with “do I need to set a proxy base URL”, the whole idea is that the host name is taken from the request.

I have no idea what could be the explanation. where is it showing port numbers? which protocol and port? you have an example? compare with https://ontwikkel.dov.vlaanderen.be/geoserver/web/

Regards

Niels

On 30/09/2019 10:04, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

I’ve just installed version 2.15.3 on our dev and test sites and double checked that your pull request is included in the relevant branch source code; which it is.

My GetCapabilities documents still seem to contain the port numbers, is it working for you / do I need to set a proxy base URL for the change to take effect?

Thanks,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 06 September 2019 08:07
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

No worries, I’m always glad if my work is useful to other people!

On 06/09/2019 08:54, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi Niels,

Thank you so much for doing that for me and for putting in the fix. I know it was done as part of something else but it may be a huge help to me anyway.

Cheers,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 05 September 2019 15:30
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

You can do it with flags now indeed, but I just made a new PR using git

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3735

So it’s merged on the 2.15 branch now

Regards

Niels

On 03/09/2019 09:39, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

I don’t think I’m on the approved committers list as I haven’t really been able to get my head around everything yet. I mostly work on Windows machines using Microsoft based languages like visual basic so I want to learn more about Java/Linux/GIT before I start committing to the main repositories really.

If you are able to backport it that would be great but if you’d like me to try I can have a go; is it just a case of issuing a new pull request and then adding the two labels / flags?

Thanks,

Paul

From: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com
Sent: 29 August 2019 13:33
To: Paul Wittle P.Wittle@anonymised.com
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

I only committed it to master but we can backport it if you want. Are you able to do that?

Regards

Niels

On 28/08/2019 09:43, Paul Wittle wrote:

Hi,

This is a silly question as I should know this by now but is your pull request now included in the latest nightly builds and has it been backported to the maintenance version or is it only on the newest versions?

Thanks,

Paul

From: Paul Wittle paul.wittle@anonymised.com
Sent: 27 August 2019 09:56
To: Niels Charlier niels@anonymised.com; geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Hi,

I’ve just got back into the office and this looks great; thanks for doing it.

Paul

From: Niels Charlier <niels@anonymised.com>
Sent: 16 August 2019 12:10
To: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

I coincidentally already have a commit that does just this (I wanted this for CSW, but it is the same thing):

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3713

On 09/08/2019 20:32, Jody Garnett wrote:

As an alternative to a debugger adding log statements into the code can also help.

Jody Garnett

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 01:59, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi Jody,

Thank you for this I will have a look again and see if I can work out how to build a local copy to test…unfortunately that is the bit that I’ve been struggling with on a Windows machine and with my level of Java experience.

As a quick side note I should say that when I used the proxy base URL I was using ${X-Forwarded-Host} as we access the server via a number of domains. It may be this that cased the port to still be present but I will investigate further.

Thanks,

Paul

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com>
Sent: 06 August 2019 00:06
To: Paul Wittle <P.Wittle@anonymised.com>
Cc: Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Port numbers in GetCapabilities

Your reading of that code seems fine, however I am not sure exactly where the proxy base URL is substituted in - I would expect it to act as an override. If you want to put some logic to ignore the HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 that should be fine.

Looks proxy base is applied as a URL Mangler (what a great name) here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/ProxifyingURLMangler.java

Can you put a breakpoint in that code and determine if it is being used correctly? It may offer you a faster workaround.

Jody Garnett

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 07:49, Paul Wittle <paul.wittle@anonymised.com> wrote:

Hi,

Would anyone be able to confirm that my reading of the source code is correct for me?

I want to be able to exclude the port number from my URLs in a GetCapabilities request (although I’m happy to make that conditional on there being a Proxy Base URL if that is better). I think I’ve tracked down the bit of the source code which constructs the baseURL in the GetCapabilities files and my reading is that the port is indeed always present.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/ows/src/main/java/org/geoserver/ows/util/ResponseUtils.java#L415

I’m assuming that the proxy base URL has already been set as req.setServerName() by the time you reach line 414 so I can’t see any obvious way that any if/then logic could be put in that function without making other changes (of course I’m just talking about in a testing fork on my own profile or something like that not the real repo).

I’ve still not managed to find the time to learn how to compile a local copy on Windows which is why I thought I’d just email as I expect people on this list will be able to just confirm that my understanding is right or wrong in seconds without the need to build a test.

Thanks in advance,

Paul

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
[https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel)

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain unclassified but sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the views of Dorset Council. Dorset Council does not accept service of documents by fax or other electronic means. Virus checking: Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that this electronic communication and its attachments whether encoded, encrypted or otherwise supplied are free from computer viruses, Dorset Council accepts no liability in respect of any loss, cost, damage or expense suffered as a result of accessing this message or any of its attachments. For information on how Dorset Council processes your information, please see www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/416433


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.