Hi,
so I tried to factor in all the feedback I got so far:
- icons
- workspace and name united
- showing title
- better looking names for the format dropdown (this
does not really work, we have to redefine something
in the output format API, more on this in a separate mail).
- filtering using abstract and keywords as well
The result is in the screenshots attached. It does not
look too good in the case the user specified a really
long layer name (there are no limits on it).
Any more feedback?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
(attachments)
I think this looks like a good improvement. The wrapping to multiple lines for long titles isn't something I find overly jarring, personally - and could be an impetus for folks to use shorter titles, which it sounds like we want to steer people towards as a best-practice anyway.
Chris
On Apr 8, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
so I tried to factor in all the feedback I got so far:
- icons
- workspace and name united
- showing title
- better looking names for the format dropdown (this
does not really work, we have to redefine something
in the output format API, more on this in a separate mail).
- filtering using abstract and keywords as well
The result is in the screenshots attached. It does not
look too good in the case the user specified a really
long layer name (there are no limits on it).
Any more feedback?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
<previewUpdated2.jpg><previewUpdated3.jpg>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel