+0
-Jukka Rahkonen-
···
Niels Charlier wrote:
Can we get a re-vote on this please? We have made changes.
On 26-01-16 22:41, Niels Charlier wrote:
Yes
On 01/26/2016 09:48 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
So Niels would you like people to review and vote on this now?
–
Jody Garnett
On 14 January 2016 at 08:38, Niels Charlier <niels@anonymised.com> wrote:
I’ve changed the proposal. I will research the HEAD proposal, but I’ll support ?metadata anyway (as it is extendible)
Regards
NielsOn 14-01-16 00:03, Jody Garnett wrote:
Correct, and tricky - wonder if our rest library supports that
Still human navigable html output our Json is not a bad thing.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:02 PM Robert Coup <robert.coup@anonymised.com…> wrote:
On 13 January 2016 at 22:48, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:
Agreed, I see the limitations - what do you think of Kevin’s idea of using a query string and avoid a parallel tree for metadata?
Isn’t that what HEAD requests are for? And return the metadata in headers?
HEAD /resource/path/to/directory
Last-Modified:
Content-Type: application/x-directory
HEAD /resource/path/to/directory/file.png
ETag:
Content-Length: 12345
Last-Modified:
Content-Type: image/png
Rob
–
–
Jody Garnett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application PerformanceAPM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/MonthMonitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions nowTroubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now_______________________________________________Geoserver-devel mailing list[Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)[https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel)
