Hi all,
We just started back up a project that is going to allow us to push the csw module to supported status. This will include (in addition to all the requirements of an extension):
- passing cite tests
- good user docs
A while back we had a discussion about some changes to the csw module as it sits currently. Here is the entire thread.
http://geoserver-devel.821594.n3.nabble.com/Geoserver-devel-review-of-csw-pull-request-td4027889.html
Long story short the changes include:
- support for the iso application profile
- integrated catalog metadata store
- some module reshuffling
I believe i got sign off on the thread to push my changes up into the main repository. But i wanted to ensure no issues with that since that was a while ago. The current branch is in my github.
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/csw/
Thoughts? Objections?
-Justin
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>wrote:
Hi all,
We just started back up a project that is going to allow us to push the
csw module to supported status. This will include (in addition to all the
requirements of an extension):
- passing cite tests
The module was passing the cite tests back in September when I provided the
first CSW version over DC records.
As far as I remember, there are no CITE tests for ISO records
- good user docs
Ha, ok, this is an undertaking 
A while back we had a discussion about some changes to the csw module as
it sits currently. Here is the entire thread.
http://geoserver-devel.821594.n3.nabble.com/Geoserver-devel-review-of-csw-pull-request-td4027889.html
Long story short the changes include:
- support for the iso application profile
- integrated catalog metadata store
- some module reshuffling
I believe i got sign off on the thread to push my changes up into the main
repository. But i wanted to ensure no issues with that since that was a
while ago. The current branch is in my github.
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/csw/
Thoughts? Objections?
Go ahead, let it roll
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com>wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>wrote:
Hi all,
We just started back up a project that is going to allow us to push the
csw module to supported status. This will include (in addition to all the
requirements of an extension):
- passing cite tests
The module was passing the cite tests back in September when I provided
the first CSW version over DC records.
As far as I remember, there are no CITE tests for ISO records
Right. My thought was to get cite passing with the simple store (hopefully
all good to go, but will fix any issues introduced) and the internal store.
- good user docs
Ha, ok, this is an undertaking
A while back we had a discussion about some changes to the csw module as
it sits currently. Here is the entire thread.
http://geoserver-devel.821594.n3.nabble.com/Geoserver-devel-review-of-csw-pull-request-td4027889.html
Long story short the changes include:
- support for the iso application profile
- integrated catalog metadata store
- some module reshuffling
I believe i got sign off on the thread to push my changes up into the
main repository. But i wanted to ensure no issues with that since that was
a while ago. The current branch is in my github.
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/csw/
Thoughts? Objections?
Go ahead, let it roll
Awesome, thanks Andrea.
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Quick question,
are we aiming for 2.4 to have this out?
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
We just started back up a project that is going to allow us to push the
csw module to supported status. This will include (in addition to all the
requirements of an extension):
- passing cite tests
The module was passing the cite tests back in September when I provided
the first CSW version over DC records.
As far as I remember, there are no CITE tests for ISO records
Right. My thought was to get cite passing with the simple store (hopefully
all good to go, but will fix any issues introduced) and the internal store.
- good user docs
Ha, ok, this is an undertaking
A while back we had a discussion about some changes to the csw module as
it sits currently. Here is the entire thread.
http://geoserver-devel.821594.n3.nabble.com/Geoserver-devel-review-of-csw-pull-request-td4027889.html
Long story short the changes include:
- support for the iso application profile
- integrated catalog metadata store
- some module reshuffling
I believe i got sign off on the thread to push my changes up into the
main repository. But i wanted to ensure no issues with that since that was a
while ago. The current branch is in my github.
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/csw/
Thoughts? Objections?
Go ahead, let it roll
Awesome, thanks Andrea.
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Good question Simone. We will actually need this on 2.3 so the idea would be to do the development on master and backport to 2.3 once its stable. I don’t forsee any issues with this given that the development is constrained to the csw modules but we’ll be happy to do a proposal when we get there. And if folks would rather keep it on 2.4.x we can work with that as well.
···
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Simone Giannecchini <simone.giannecchini@anonymised.com> wrote:
Quick question,
are we aiming for 2.4 to have this out?
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
We just started back up a project that is going to allow us to push the
csw module to supported status. This will include (in addition to all the
requirements of an extension):
The module was passing the cite tests back in September when I provided
the first CSW version over DC records.
As far as I remember, there are no CITE tests for ISO records
Right. My thought was to get cite passing with the simple store (hopefully
all good to go, but will fix any issues introduced) and the internal store.
Ha, ok, this is an undertaking
A while back we had a discussion about some changes to the csw module as
it sits currently. Here is the entire thread.
http://geoserver-devel.821594.n3.nabble.com/Geoserver-devel-review-of-csw-pull-request-td4027889.html
Long story short the changes include:
- support for the iso application profile
- integrated catalog metadata store
- some module reshuffling
I believe i got sign off on the thread to push my changes up into the
main repository. But i wanted to ensure no issues with that since that was a
while ago. The current branch is in my github.
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/tree/csw/
Thoughts? Objections?
Go ahead, let it roll
Awesome, thanks Andrea.
Cheers
Andrea
–
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>wrote:
The module was passing the cite tests back in September when I provided
the first CSW version over DC records.
As far as I remember, there are no CITE tests for ISO records
Right. My thought was to get cite passing with the simple store (hopefully
all good to go, but will fix any issues introduced) and the internal store.
Ah, that might prove to be difficult for the internal store: the CITE tests
are checking that you serve a dozen of quite specific
records, not sure what would happen if you start exposing more (or less)
properties in those
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com>wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com>wrote:
The module was passing the cite tests back in September when I provided
the first CSW version over DC records.
As far as I remember, there are no CITE tests for ISO records
Right. My thought was to get cite passing with the simple store
(hopefully all good to go, but will fix any issues introduced) and the
internal store.
Ah, that might prove to be difficult for the internal store: the CITE
tests are checking that you serve a dozen of quite specific
records, not sure what would happen if you start exposing more (or less)
properties in those
Right. I remember you mentioning that before. Maybe it doesn't make sense.
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.