Hi,
so we need a RC4. What about doing one early next week (Tuesday?)
There are a couple of issues pending, I should be able to fix the
first shortly (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4445), what
about the GWC related one, which was discussed on the ml
but did not have a jira so far?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4454
Oh, as far as I know there are also, likely, those two:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4283
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4427
As far as I know none of the other issues tagged for 2.1.0
are actually serious enough or have backing to actually
get into 2.1.0
Btw, what about gt2? 2.7.1 one week after 2.7.0? 
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
Btw, what about gt2? 2.7.1 one week after 2.7.0?
I was thinking if we could have used 2.7.0, but no, the coverage reprojection
bug had to be fixed in geotools
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
I think that sounds good.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi,
so we need a RC4. What about doing one early next week (Tuesday?)
There are a couple of issues pending, I should be able to fix the
first shortly (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4445), what
about the GWC related one, which was discussed on the ml
but did not have a jira so far?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4454
Oh, as far as I know there are also, likely, those two:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4283
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4427
I would also like to add this one to the list which also has a patch awaiting review:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4446
Actually the patch builds on the patch for GEOS-4283.
As far as I know none of the other issues tagged for 2.1.0
are actually serious enough or have backing to actually
get into 2.1.0
Btw, what about gt2? 2.7.1 one week after 2.7.0?
Yeah, the fix for GEOS-4283 also requires a geotools change as well… but yeah that is pretty quick for another release. That said these are good fixes. If anyone has an issue with releasing gt so quickly we could just tag this time… Also if you want to distribute the release load I can take gt and you take gs? Or vice versa.
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
I think that sounds good.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com>
wrote:
Hi,
so we need a RC4. What about doing one early next week (Tuesday?)
There are a couple of issues pending, I should be able to fix the
first shortly (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4445), what
about the GWC related one, which was discussed on the ml
but did not have a jira so far?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4454
Oh, as far as I know there are also, likely, those two:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4283
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4427
I would also like to add this one to the list which also has a patch
awaiting review:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4446
Actually the patch builds on the patch for GEOS-4283.
As far as I know none of the other issues tagged for 2.1.0
are actually serious enough or have backing to actually
get into 2.1.0
Btw, what about gt2? 2.7.1 one week after 2.7.0?
Yeah, the fix for GEOS-4283 also requires a geotools change as well... but
yeah that is pretty quick for another release. That said these are good
fixes. If anyone has an issue with releasing gt so quickly we could just tag
this time...
I guess tagging would be good. But I'm also going to ask on the
gt ml to hear how people feel about it.
Also if you want to distribute the release load I can take gt
and you take gs? Or vice versa.
Very appreciated, we'll work out the details of who tags what later? 
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
sounds good to me too. I'll add the quota disablement flag in time, and
can help with the release process.
Gabriel
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 17:34 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
> I think that sounds good.
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> so we need a RC4. What about doing one early next week (Tuesday?)
>> There are a couple of issues pending, I should be able to fix the
>> first shortly (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4445), what
>> about the GWC related one, which was discussed on the ml
>> but did not have a jira so far?
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4454
>>
>> Oh, as far as I know there are also, likely, those two:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4283
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4427
>
> I would also like to add this one to the list which also has a patch
> awaiting review:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4446
> Actually the patch builds on the patch for GEOS-4283.
>>
>> As far as I know none of the other issues tagged for 2.1.0
>> are actually serious enough or have backing to actually
>> get into 2.1.0
>>
>> Btw, what about gt2? 2.7.1 one week after 2.7.0?
>
> Yeah, the fix for GEOS-4283 also requires a geotools change as well... but
> yeah that is pretty quick for another release. That said these are good
> fixes. If anyone has an issue with releasing gt so quickly we could just tag
> this time...
I guess tagging would be good. But I'm also going to ask on the
gt ml to hear how people feel about it.
> Also if you want to distribute the release load I can take gt
> and you take gs? Or vice versa.
Very appreciated, we'll work out the details of who tags what later?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Gabriel Roldan
groldan@anonymised.com
Expert service straight from the developers