I haven't applied this patch to try it out, so excuse me if these questions aren't relevant.
Glancing at the patch, it looks like an HTML list is returned for GET requests to the fonts resource. Would alternate content types be possible? A JSON representation would be particularly useful.
I assume a font has both a unique identifier (name?) and a human friendly title (fontName?). Are both of these provided? If not, this would be useful information for clients that want to let users choose a font based on the title and use the identifier for communication with GeoServer.
Again, I'm not sure what you have already implemented, but the following minimal JSON representation would be useful from a client perspective.
{
"fonts": [
{
"id": "foo",
"name": "Foo"
}, {
"id": "bar",
"name: "Bar"
}
]
}
(And links to other resources & representations would be a bonus.)
Apologies if this is not entirely relevant given what you have done.
Tim
On 10/14/10 1:50 AM, jose garcia wrote:
Hi Andrea
Thanks for the comments. I'll check to fix these things and provide a
patch and sorry but my knoweledge of GeoServer code is quite limited for
now.
Regards,
Jose García
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com <mailto:andrea.aime@anonymised.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:56 AM, jose garcia <josegar74@anonymised.com
<mailto:josegar74@anonymised.com>> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I created a new issue in JIRA (GEOS-4175) with a patch to add a
REST service
> to return the list of fonts avalaible in the java runtime in the
server.
>
> Would be nice if you can review so can be improved (sorry i'm
quite new to
> GeoServer code and for sure the code can be improved) and when
seem ok
> integrate SVN for nexts releases.
The patch you've provided implies changes to the catalog api.
I cannot say for certain, but such a change is unlikely to work for
the stable series
(I see that you've developed it against 2.0.2).
I'm also not sure why the catalog should be involved in the first
place, the list
of fonts is known to the java runtime itself, so there is no need to
re-catalogue
the fonts inside the GeoServer API, no?
>From another point of view, the data directory is meant to be
movable from
one system to another: but the list of font won't be the same on the
two systems,
so it does not make sense to store the list of fonts inside the
GeoServer data
directory either.
Also, in order to be accepted a patch must be developed for trunk,
since that's
where it has to go first (and then be eventually backported if it
does not break
the API).
If you look in trunk there is also the transparent ability to use
any font that
has been dropped into the styles directory, with some code that
registers
the fonts found there in the GeoTools FontCache.
Ideally we should extend that class a bit more to allow listing the
fonts
known to the rendering subsystem (that api change we can also make in
a stable series as FontCache is a class, not an interface).
So what about this:
* the catalog part of the patch gets removed
* we add a method in FontCache to list the known fonts
* the rest part of the patch gets moved to use the FontCache as the
source of known fonts
Cheers
Andrea
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
Senior Software Engineer
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584962313
fax: +39 0584962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.