Hi all,
Merging the lastest changes from trunk to 1.4.x I notice that the sld PutStyles stuff is acting like its own service in terms of package structure, and service id.
Since the operation is defined as a WMS operation does it make sense to keep it in the WMS package structure? And referenced via the wms context, ie geoserver/wms vs geoserver/sld?
Perhaps maybe not. Just something that caught my eye.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
jdeolive@anonymised.com
Yep I put it in its own because there was going to be the SLD editor
in there and a few other things. But the way it is looking now, it is
different from the origional plans. It can be pushed into WMS if you
would like.
I don't care if we reference it with geoserver/wms vs geoserver/sld.
It's not a full implementation anyways, and there is no getStyles yet
either. So whatever people want.
- Brent
On 7/3/06, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Merging the lastest changes from trunk to 1.4.x I notice that the sld
PutStyles stuff is acting like its own service in terms of package
structure, and service id.Since the operation is defined as a WMS operation does it make sense to
keep it in the WMS package structure? And referenced via the wms
context, ie geoserver/wms vs geoserver/sld?Perhaps maybe not. Just something that caught my eye.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
jdeolive@anonymised.comUsing Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel