That's good. He might need an actual Change Request though, in order to
put in changes. He cannot just unilaterally edit it in.
Oh, you're talking about changing the 1.0 spec, not input into the
in-progress 1.1.
Does the OGC actually change things? Have they acted on your 4d
extension to WKT/WKB?
I seem to doubt they'll be making any changes to 1.0 when 1.1 is in
progress.
dave
----------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/
No, I'm talking about input into 1.1. It's the whole "process oriented" thing. Change requests are what the "editor" is responsible for stitching into the specification. The change requests get voted on in the RWG to determine if the editor is allowed to incorporate them.
On the WKT/WKB thing, oddly, yes. An SFSQL RWG was struck at the last meeting and we have started talking. The scope is spooging out a lot larger than the minor changes we would want though, should be an interesting process. I am going to do up Change Requests to cover all the additions we have made. The 3D extension was already accepted, apparently, just never integrated. Martin Daly carried the 3D revision through several years ago. 4D might end up being different, something more like the SQL/MM syntax.
Paul
On 12-May-05, at 5:04 PM, dblasby@anonymised.com wrote:
That's good. He might need an actual Change Request though, in order to
put in changes. He cannot just unilaterally edit it in.
Oh, you're talking about changing the 1.0 spec, not input into the
in-progress 1.1.
Does the OGC actually change things? Have they acted on your 4d
extension to WKT/WKB?
I seem to doubt they'll be making any changes to 1.0 when 1.1 is in
progress.
dave
----------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/
I may have missed part of the thread.
What is being changed or being proposed as changes to WKT/WKB for
3/4D representation?
David
At 08:04 PM 5/12/2005, you wrote:
>That's good. He might need an actual Change Request though, in order to
>put in changes. He cannot just unilaterally edit it in.
Oh, you're talking about changing the 1.0 spec, not input into the
in-progress 1.1.
Does the OGC actually change things? Have they acted on your 4d
extension to WKT/WKB?
I seem to doubt they'll be making any changes to 1.0 when 1.1 is in
progress.
dave
----------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel