Does anyone have member access to the OGC docs? Specifically WFS
1.1/Filter 1.1? I am pretty positive it is approved by ogc, just not up
on the public site yet. I don't necessarily need a copy of the spec, I
just need details on the orderedby filter, so that I can come up with a
plan to implement it, so that we get the names right.
thanks,
Chris
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Norman Barker wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks, that would be useful. there are a whole team of people here who
need this sorting,
and will be able to put some development time in to get it working.If you can send me some pointers I will get started and pass it on when
I leave.thanks,
Norman
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 01:41 -0500, Chris Holmes wrote:
> Hey, I missedd this email until just now, I was not really working the end
> of last week, so just scanned my emails. I can definitely give you some
> pointers, I'll try to write it up monday or tuesday. It will probably
> involve getting dirty with geotools. Though actually we need the new WFS
> and Filter specs to do it right, and to get the names right. Hopefully we
> can find someone with member access - though they are supposed to be
> released very soon. If it's all in the filter spec, as David indicated it
> might be, then it actually should be fairly easy to implement.
>
> Chris
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Norman Barker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I used xsl:sort (we are requesting XML through Apache Cocoon to
> > Geoserver), and there is a big time penalty, so I wanted to move it more
> > towards the WFS and database.
> >
> > If anyone can give some pointers we are happy to have a go at
> > implementing it!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Norman
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 18:47 +0100, Pierrick Brihaye wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Chris Holmes a écrit :
> > >
> > > > I have not heard anyone request this before, but I don't think it
> > > would be that hard to do. We could add a vendor specific 'orderby'
> > > param, and pass that off as a hint in the GeoTools query - datastores
> > > that could handle it could turn it into sql.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mmmh... this would break genericity IMHO (I am definitely not
> > > SQL-centric ;-). Why not provide a hook that would redirect the flow to
> > > an XSLT processor that could use <xsl:sort> (a kind of Cocoon-like
> > > pipeline) ?
> > >
> > > Well, if the concern is sorting, there will be a penalty performance.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > >
> > > p.b.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Geoserver-devel mailing list
> > > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geoserver-devel mailing list
> > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
> >
>
--