Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this.
Sure, go ahead. The login is the same as the main build box.
I could not see any specific setting, hope you have better luck 
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this.
Sure, go ahead. The login is the same as the main build box.
I could not see any specific setting, hope you have better luck
Cool. And yeah, it is because it is a maven specific job it seems. Any objections to havign it mirror the other hudson as a freestyle build? The maven build seems easier to maintain but my fear is that spamming the dev list will cause people to ignore it.
Cheers
Andrea
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this.
Sure, go ahead. The login is the same as the main build box.
I could not see any specific setting, hope you have better luckCool. And yeah, it is because it is a maven specific job it seems. Any objections to havign it mirror the other hudson as a freestyle build? The maven build seems easier to maintain but my fear is that spamming the dev list will cause people to ignore it.
Actually the main hudson box is using regular maven builds too it seems:
http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/configure
May be just the different Hudson version.
If we switch away I also think we'll loose the unit testing reporting
that made people ask we upgrade the main build box as well.
Maybe it's better to ask on the Hudson mailing list if it's possible
somehow to avoid this mail flood without throwing away the other
benefits?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
Ok, seems I was confused. I could have sworn I set up the original hudson like that. Seems I am losing it. But yeah, i guess it is time to dig deeper into the hudson docs or configuration files to try and find the option for a single mail.
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Andrea Aime wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this.
Sure, go ahead. The login is the same as the main build box.
I could not see any specific setting, hope you have better luckCool. And yeah, it is because it is a maven specific job it seems. Any objections to havign it mirror the other hudson as a freestyle build? The maven build seems easier to maintain but my fear is that spamming the dev list will cause people to ignore it.
Actually the main hudson box is using regular maven builds too it seems:
http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/configureMay be just the different Hudson version.
If we switch away I also think we'll loose the unit testing reporting
that made people ask we upgrade the main build box as well.Maybe it's better to ask on the Hudson mailing list if it's possible
somehow to avoid this mail flood without throwing away the other
benefits?Cheers
Andrea
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.