Hi folks,
What do people think about putting out another 2.2 beta soon, like this week or next some time? There have been some good fixes since beta1:
Currently there is only one high priority issue in the queue.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5019
No so sure about this one… should this one hold up a beta release?
Thanks.
-Justin
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
Justin,
I have added this one which, in my view, is pretty severe as it will impact many WFS 2.0 users (anyone using paging?):
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5085
The WMS resource exhaustion problem (GEOS-5019) is nasty as well, but unless it is a new regression I don't think it should hold up the beta. Looks like a corner case to me.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 07/05/12 10:03, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi folks,
What do people think about putting out another 2.2 beta soon, like this
week or next some time? There have been some good fixes since beta1:http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+("2.2.x"%2C+"2.2-beta2")+AND+status+in+(Resolved)
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+("2.2.x"%2C+"2.2-beta2")+AND+status+in+(Resolved)>Currently there is only one high priority issue in the queue.
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+("2.2.x"%2C+"2.2-beta2")+AND+status+in+(Open%2C+"In+Progress"%2C+Reopened)+and+priority+>%3D+Critical
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+("2.2.x"%2C+"2.2-beta2")+AND+status+in+(Open%2C+"In+Progress"%2C+Reopened)+and+priority+>%3D+Critical>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5019
No so sure about this one... should this one hold up a beta release?
Thanks.
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
What do people think about putting out another 2.2 beta soon, like this week or next some time? There have been some good fixes since beta1:
Currently there is only one high priority issue in the queue.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5019
No so sure about this one… should this one hold up a beta release?
Imho no, it should not, when entering a beta cycle the product is normally feature complete
but known to be buggy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta
Btw, we should re-enable the CITE tests builds for trunk
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:
Justin,
I have added this one which, in my view, is pretty severe as it will impact many WFS 2.0 users (anyone using paging?):
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5085
Right… commented on that issue, still slightly confused by it.
The WMS resource exhaustion problem (GEOS-5019) is nasty as well, but unless it is a new regression I don’t think it should hold up the beta. Looks like a corner case to me.
Kind regards,
Ben.On 07/05/12 10:03, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi folks,
What do people think about putting out another 2.2 beta soon, like this
week or next some time? There have been some good fixes since beta1:http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+%28%222.2.x%22%2C+%222.2-beta2%22%29+AND+status+in+%28Resolved%29
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+%28%222.2.x%22%2C+%222.2-beta2%22%29+AND+status+in+%28Resolved%29>Currently there is only one high priority issue in the queue.
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+%28%222.2.x%22%2C+%222.2-beta2%22%29+AND+status+in+%28Open%2C+%22In+Progress%22%2C+Reopened%29+and+priority+%3E%3D+Critical
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+GeoServer+AND+fixVersion+in+%28%222.2.x%22%2C+%222.2-beta2%22%29+AND+status+in+%28Open%2C+%22In+Progress%22%2C+Reopened%29+and+priority+%3E%3D+Critical>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5019
No so sure about this one… should this one hold up a beta release?
Thanks.
-Justin
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.–
Ben Caradoc-Davies Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
What do people think about putting out another 2.2 beta soon, like this week or next some time? There have been some good fixes since beta1:
Currently there is only one high priority issue in the queue.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5019
No so sure about this one… should this one hold up a beta release?
Imho no, it should not, when entering a beta cycle the product is normally feature complete
but known to be buggy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta
Right, but thought I should ask since if i recall correctly (although I don’t have any example off hand and i am not going to go digging through the archives) we have decided to postpone releases due to key issues we wanted to fix. . Just wondering if this is one of those types of issues.
Btw, we should re-enable the CITE tests builds for trunk
Right. Like a bad dream i had forgotten about them.
Cheers
Andrea–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech leadVia Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italyphone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Right, but thought I should ask since if i recall correctly (although I don’t have any example off hand and i am not going to go digging through the archives) we have decided to postpone releases due to key issues we wanted to fix. . Just wondering if this is one of those types of issues.
Hmm… it’s annoying indeed, though we used that transformation quite a bit without
seeing the ill effects the user is reporting.
At the same time, the issue shows up only if the WPS extension is added into the mix,
which is not core yet for good reasons (lack of service limits, impossibility to control
the list of processes exposed to the final user).
I did not touch the priority of the jira, but I’d say that while the issue might be critical for
the user it does not seem critical to the GeoServer project as a whole.
That said, next weekend I’ll try to have a look at it
Btw, we should re-enable the CITE tests builds for trunk
Right. Like a bad dream i had forgotten about them.
:-p
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
I opened another issue the security system has to fix.
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5101
I would like to get this into beta 2 since it is the last major issue I am aware of (there are other issues too, but not so important). I would like to solve this at weekend.
Opinions ?
2012/5/7 Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@anonymised.com>
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Right, but thought I should ask since if i recall correctly (although I don’t have any example off hand and i am not going to go digging through the archives) we have decided to postpone releases due to key issues we wanted to fix. . Just wondering if this is one of those types of issues.
Hmm… it’s annoying indeed, though we used that transformation quite a bit without
seeing the ill effects the user is reporting.At the same time, the issue shows up only if the WPS extension is added into the mix,
which is not core yet for good reasons (lack of service limits, impossibility to control
the list of processes exposed to the final user).
I did not touch the priority of the jira, but I’d say that while the issue might be critical for
the user it does not seem critical to the GeoServer project as a whole.That said, next weekend I’ll try to have a look at it
Btw, we should re-enable the CITE tests builds for trunk
Right. Like a bad dream i had forgotten about them.
:-p
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech leadVia Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italyphone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Christian Mueller <mcrmcr21@anonymised.com> wrote:
I opened another issue the security system has to fix.
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5101
I would like to get this into beta 2 since it is the last major issue I am aware of (there are other issues too, but not so important). I would like to solve this at weekend.
Opinions ?
Ok, although if it goes past the weekend we may want to consider releasing a beta without it. I also made some comments about how to implement the prefixed role system. Basically I would like us to remain totally backward compatible and still support non-prefixed roles.
Anyways, if others are ok with release next week that work for me. It gives me time this week to work on getting cite tests passing again.
2012/5/7 Andrea Aime <andrea.aime@…1268…>
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@anonymised.com> wrote:
Right, but thought I should ask since if i recall correctly (although I don’t have any example off hand and i am not going to go digging through the archives) we have decided to postpone releases due to key issues we wanted to fix. . Just wondering if this is one of those types of issues.
Hmm… it’s annoying indeed, though we used that transformation quite a bit without
seeing the ill effects the user is reporting.At the same time, the issue shows up only if the WPS extension is added into the mix,
which is not core yet for good reasons (lack of service limits, impossibility to control
the list of processes exposed to the final user).
I did not touch the priority of the jira, but I’d say that while the issue might be critical for
the user it does not seem critical to the GeoServer project as a whole.That said, next weekend I’ll try to have a look at it
Btw, we should re-enable the CITE tests builds for trunk
Right. Like a bad dream i had forgotten about them.
:-p
Cheers
Andrea
–
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech leadVia Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italyphone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today’s security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
–
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.