I have also a question, how about the review for the emf gt2 module? I
need to create a review for it also or it is sufficient to just modify
the package name as for Justin suggestions?
I have also a question, how about the review for the emf gt2 module? I
need to create a review for it also or it is sufficient to just modify
the package name as for Justin suggestions?
I would think so. Generating the model from the schema does not leave a a lot to be done. The packaging renaming is sufficient for me.
Justin when I last looked at this it was making use of a generated EMF object; rather than making use of BoundingBox. My impression was there was a few places in the model where we could make use of BoundingBox and Unit and a few other normal classes (to help integrate with the rest of the application).
Perhaps when I am next online someone can show me how to use crucible?
Jody
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi Alessio,
I have also a question, how about the review for the emf gt2 module? I
need to create a review for it also or it is sufficient to just modify
the package name as for Justin suggestions?
I would think so. Generating the model from the schema does not leave a a lot to be done. The packaging renaming is sufficient for me.
Ciao Jody,
I was actually discussing something like that with alessio just
yesterday, can you be bit more specific since I am quite interested in
your feedback.
Ciao,
Simone.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@anonymised.com> wrote:
Justin when I last looked at this it was making use of a generated EMF
object; rather than making use of BoundingBox. My impression was there
was a few places in the model where we could make use of BoundingBox and
Unit and a few other normal classes (to help integrate with the rest of
the application).
Perhaps when I am next online someone can show me how to use crucible?
Jody
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi Alessio,
I have also a question, how about the review for the emf gt2 module? I
need to create a review for it also or it is sufficient to just modify
the package name as for Justin suggestions?
I would think so. Generating the model from the schema does not leave a
a lot to be done. The packaging renaming is sufficient for me.
Cheers,
Alessio.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini
President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy