cool. just a couple notes on that.
An area is simply a "way" that connects to itself to form a closed polygon. There "area" object in the database will be deprecated. The docs on the wiki were out of date, fixed that.
For transactions, an atomic PUT of multiple objects is being looked into.
For rollbacks, it will probably be done by date on an object.
There might also be a desire to rollback an entire bbox defined region, though this complicates things through cascading effects into outside regions.
----- Original Message ----
From: Andrea Aime <aaime@anonymised.com>
To: mikel.maron@anonymised.com
Cc: Raj Singh <rsingh@anonymised.com>; Jo Walsh <jo@anonymised.com>; Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; wfsbasic.users@anonymised.com; Geotools-Devel list <geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:42:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WFSBasic.Users] [Geotools-devel] Versioning WFS-T and protocol extensions
mikel.maron@anonymised.com ha scritto:
Here's what the current usage profile of the OpenStreetMap API. It's
worked extremely well, and been implemented by many clients.
... funny... I did more or less the same summary this morning after
reading the API and sql informations:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/Versioning+WFS+-+OpenStreetMap
Cheers
Andrea