Hi, working for georchestra project we have implemented the following approach
for the issue.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-572
Pull requset for master
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/217
and 2.3.x
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/205
We hope it could be useful for geoserver.
--
Mauricio Pazos
On Monday, April 15, 2013 04:00:15 PM Mauricio Pazos wrote:
Hi, working for georchestra project we have implemented the following
approach for the issue.http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-572
Pull requset for master
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/217
and 2.3.x
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/205
We hope it could be useful for geoserver.
Hi, the patch was improved and merged by Andrea Aime. Could you consider
backport this feature to 2.3.x?
Thanks
--
Mauricio Pazos
+0
The timing is OK as we are not yet two weeks out. Might benefit from more time on master, but the change is small.
I put "Proposal: Backport: " in the title to attract PSC attention.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 29/04/13 19:22, Mauricio Pazos wrote:
On Monday, April 15, 2013 04:00:15 PM Mauricio Pazos wrote:
Hi, working for georchestra project we have implemented the following
approach for the issue.http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-572
Pull requset for master
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/217
and 2.3.x
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/205
We hope it could be useful for geoserver.
Hi, the patch was improved and merged by Andrea Aime. Could you consider
backport this feature to 2.3.x?Thanks
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:
+0
The timing is OK as we are not yet two weeks out. Might benefit from
more time on master, but the change is small.I put "Proposal: Backport: " in the title to attract PSC attention.
I'd say +1, the patch is rather small, seems innocuous aside from some
formatting issues (which I've just
noticed, not sure where they are coming from):
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commit/8eeef072e887ce135b25058c0ce7f8b65ca549ad
Cheers
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your votes guys.
For the record, this development was supported by our customer, the
GIP ATGeRI [http://cartogip.fr/\].
We're happy to contribute it back to the geoserver community.
Thanks,
F.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.aime@anonymised.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:+0
The timing is OK as we are not yet two weeks out. Might benefit from
more time on master, but the change is small.I put "Proposal: Backport: " in the title to attract PSC attention.
I'd say +1
--
Camptocamp France SAS, Chambéry
http://www.camptocamp.com/fr/geospatial-solutions
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
Ben.Caradoc-Davies@anonymised.com> wrote:
+0
The timing is OK as we are not yet two weeks out. Might benefit from
more time on master, but the change is small.I put "Proposal: Backport: " in the title to attract PSC attention.
It seem that did not work, but in the meantime, the patch has been on trunk
for over a month and a half
with no complains.
So this morning I took the time to port it back to 2.3.x
Cheers
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------