Hi,
One thing to consider is also to get rid of ECW files by converting them to tiled, jpeg-compressed GeoTIFFs and to creating overviews. Process is pretty fast and quality loss is not huge and you can save money because then you do not need to acquire ECW license which is always required if ECW libraries are used on the server side.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Hans Gregers Petersen wrote:
Hi Lucas,
> Ok, so an VRT file is not a solution in combination with geoserver.
Apparently not - sorry for leading you down a stray (but good) path
> I'm not so familiar with this many EVW files and GDAL.
> What is the best solution to look into in combination with geoserver?I would look into "emulating" (if I may call it that) the VRT-approach using the
style Andrea described previously.Cheers,
Greg
--
Hans Gregers Petersen
Partner, Senior Consultant
www.septima.dk------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktr
k
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
